Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 2345   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Year : 1998  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 110-112

Bronchoalveolar Lavage In Patients Of Lung Cancer - A Comparison Between The Involved And Uninvolved Lung



Correspondence Address:
Rashmi N Sharma


Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was carried out in 15 patients of lung cancer and 10 nonmalignant lung diseases which included patients of sarcoidosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and haemoptysis. In lung cancer patients BAL was carried out on the diseased lung and from the opposite normal lung. The total cell count in the malignant lobe of lung cancer patients was significantly greater as compared to that of disease free lobe and non-malignant lung diseases. The predominant cell was the macrophages constituting greater than 92% in all the three groups followed by lymphocytes (4-5%) and then the polymorphs (1-2%). Since alveolar macrophages are the main cellular components of the defense system in the lungs and they are known to produce numerous secretory products including reactive oxygen metabolites it needs further study whether an increase in these cells could be contributory for the development of lung cancer or they help the enhancement of already existing pathogenesis.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed276    
    Printed23    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded87    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal