|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 31-33
Malignant pleural mesothelioma without asbestos exposure with distant metastasis in a peripheral lymph node: A case report
Surya Kant, Sanjay Kumar Verma, Sanjay
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow., India
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow.
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon pleural neoplasm and usually associated with inhalation exposure to asbestos. About 20% of the patients have no demonstrable exposure to asbestos. It rarely metastasizes in peripheral lymph nodes. Here is a case report of malignant pleural mesothelioma without asbestos exposure with cervical lymph node metastasis
Keywords: Malignant mesothelioma, asbestos, lymph nodes
|How to cite this article:|
Kant S, Verma SK, Sanjay. Malignant pleural mesothelioma without asbestos exposure with distant metastasis in a peripheral lymph node: A case report. Lung India 2008;25:31-3
|How to cite this URL:|
Kant S, Verma SK, Sanjay. Malignant pleural mesothelioma without asbestos exposure with distant metastasis in a peripheral lymph node: A case report. Lung India [serial online] 2008 [cited 2016 Oct 22];25:31-3. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2008/25/1/31/44137
| Introduction|| |
The most common primary malignant tumor of the pleura is malignant mesothelioma, an insidious neoplasm with a dismal prognosis arising from the mesothelial surfaces of the pleura. Malignant mesothelioma may metastasize to lymph nodes outside thorax.  However, distant metastases are rare, and it is exceptional for patients to present with lymphadenopathy prior to the discovery of the primary tumor. 
| Case Report|| |
A 68 years male, retired clerk and chronic bidi smoker was admitted to our department with complaint of right sided pleuritic chest pain for 1 month and a painful right cervical mass. No occupational or domestic contact with asbestos could be elicited. Physical examination revealed a single, hard, moveable and tender right sided cervical lymph node of size 4x4 cm. Respiratory system examination revealed stony dull note and absent breath sounds in right infraxillary and infrascapular regions. Examination of other systems was unremarkable.
His hematological and bio-chemical investigations were within normal limits. His chest x-ray PA view revealed right sided pleural effusion. His PPD was negative. His sputum smear for AFB and malignant cells was negative. His CT-Thorax revealed right sided mediastinal lymphadenopathy (right Para tracheal and precarinal) with right sided pleural effusion [Figure 1].
Pleural fluid aspiration was hemorrhagic in colour. Pleural fluid examination revealed: Protein: 3.36 gm%, sugar: 75mg%, Total cell count: 4000/mm 3 , Differential Leukocyte Count: L81, P19, Lactic Dehydrogenase: 3775 U/ml, Adenosine Deaminase: 23.60 U/L along with large numbers of mesothelial cells. His pleural fluid cytology revealed malignant mesothelioma [Figure 2]. Closed pleural biopsy was done which was nondiagnostic. Open pleural biopsy was planned but patient did not give consent for this.
Biopsy of right sided cervical lymph node revealed atypical proliferated cuboidal or columnar epithelial cells arranged in an irregular tubo-papillary pattern with fair degree of anisonucleosis and angulation of cell outline [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. Immunohistochemical stains showed positivity for Pancytokeratin and negative reactivity for CEA and CD-15 (Leu-M 1 ). Thus the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma was confirmed.
The case was considered as M1 in stage IV according to the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (IMIG) staging system  , and in stage III according to the Butchard staging system  . His treatment was planned but patient expired just after 2 days of hospital stay from respiratory failure.
| Discussion|| |
Pleural mesothelioma typically presents with chest pain and pleural effusion  , as in this case. The effusions are frequently large, occupying 50% or more of the hemithorax and obscuring the pleural tumour. The tumour generally spreads by local invasion throughout the pleural cavity to the chest wall and to the axilla and supraclavicular area. The diaphragm, as well as the surface of the peritoneum or intraabdominal organs, may also be involved.
Distant metastatic disease is unusual  in mesothelioma but may involve the liver, bone, brain, adrenal gland, kidney, pancreas, thyroid, spleen, skin and lymph nodes. Hilar and mediastinal lymph node involvement occurs in less than 50% of patients. Extrathoracic lymph node involvement is very rare. Cervical lymph node metastasis has been reported at autopsy  . Clinically documented distant lymph node metastasis from pleural mesothelioma is very rare  .
The mean age of patients with malignant mesothelioma is approximately 60 years  (in our case the age was 60 years) but the disease can occur at any age, including childhood. The male to female ratio is 4: 1  with a predominance of right side over the left (60: 40)  .
Mesothelioma has a strong relationship with asbestos exposure. About 20% of the patients have no demonstrable exposure to asbestos , . Possibility of association of malignant mesothelioma and exposure to some dust or chemicals (stone cutter, leather factory or textile factory worker, agricultural chemicals) has also been reported. In the present case, the patient was a retired clerk and was not exposed to any of the known etiological factors. Our patient was a chronic smoker and it can be presumed that smoking could possibility have led to malignant mesothelioma of the pleura.
Histologically malignant mesotheliomas are of three types: Epithelial, Sarcomatoid and Mixed. Epithelial type is commonest which is seen in 50 to 60 percent of cases. Immunohistochemical assays developed for specific antigens are often helpful in differentiating mesothelioma from metastatic adenocarcinoma of various origins. Such antigens include carcinoembryonic antigen, CD15 (LeuM1), and epithelial membrane antigen. Carcinoembryonic antigen and CD15 are typically absent in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma  .
Diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma by non- invasive techniques like chest radiography, bronchoscopy, pleural fluid cytology and CT scan is rarely confirmatory  . In malignant mesothelioma pleural fluid is usually exudative with lymphocytic predominance (71 % was in present case). Pleural fluid LDH is usually more than 600 IU/ml; while in our case it was 3775 IU/ml. Open pleural biopsy of the tumour mass is most often required for confirmation of diagnosis  .
Many anticancer agents have been studied in patients with MPM, either as single agents or as part of a combination chemotherapy regimen. Response rates have ranged from 0 to 48%, with the highest response rates generally achieved using multiagent regimens. However, no clear standard of care using available agents has emerged due to a lack of clearly demonstrated survival or palliative benefit in the setting of well-designed, randomized, and controlled clinical trials. Radiation has shown palliative benefit in reducing pain and symptoms of dyspnea. Surgical pleurodesis can reduce the symptoms associated with recurrent or persistent pleural effusions, and chemotherapy has demonstrated palliative benefit in terms of overall quality of life  .
In conclusion, although extrathoracic lymph node metastases in malignant mesothelioma are very rare, nevertheless, in suspected cases, lymph node biopsy needs to be performed for the diagnosis of the metastatic disease.
| References|| |
|1.||Craig FE et al. Occult metastatic mesothelioma-diagnosis by fine needle aspiration. A case report. Am J Clin Pathol 1992;97: 493-7, |
|2.||Sussman J, Rosai J. Lymph node metastasis as the initial manifestation of malignant mesothelioma. Report of six cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 97: 493-7. |
|3.||Butchard EG et al. Pleuropneumonectomy in the management of diffuse malignant mesothelioma of the pleura. Experience with 29 patients. Thorax 1976; 31: 15-24. |
|4.||Rusch VW,A proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant mesothelioma. Chest 1995; 108:1122. |
|5.||Antman KH. Clinical presentation and natural history of benign and malignant mesothelioma. Semin Oncol 1981; 8: 313-320. [PUBMED] |
|6.||Elmes PC, Simpson JCM, The clinical aspects of mesothelioma. Q J Med 1976; 69: 427-449. |
|7.||Ansari NA, Derias NW. Diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma by -fine needle aspiration of a cervical lymph node. A case report. Acta Cytol 2000; 44: 70-4. |
|8.||Kim BS, Varkey B, choi H. Diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma by axillary lymph node biopsy. Chest 1987; 91: 278-81. |
|9.||Roberts G.H. Diffuse pleural mesothelioma - A clinical pathological study. Brit J Dis Chest 1970; 64:201. |
|10.||Connelly RR, Spirtas R, Myers M.H., Percy C.L., Fraument J.F. Jr. Demographic patterns for mesothelioma in the United States. J Clin Oncol 1987; 78: 1053. |
|11.||Hillerdal G. Malignant mesothelioma: Review of 4710 published cases. Br J Dis Chest 1983; 77: 321. [PUBMED] |
|12.||Rajendra Prasad, Surya Kant, Pulak Mehrotra, K. Suresh Babu, P,K. Agarwal. Mesothelioma: a report on 3 cases. Ind J Tub 1998; 45: 29-30. |
|13.||Gaur SN, Raj Kumar. Malignant pleural mesothelioma without asbestos exposure. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 1999; 41: 61-64. |
|14.||King JA, Tucker JA. Evaluation of membranous staining of mesothelioma. Cell Vis 1998; 5: 24-27. [PUBMED] |
|15.||Shearin JC,Jackson D. malignant pleural mesothelioma:report of 19 cases. J Thorax Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 71: 621-627. |
|16.||Whit Well F,Rawcliffe RM. Diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. Thorax 1971; 26: 6-22. |
|17.||Massimo Pistolesi, James Rusthoven. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Update, Current Management, and Newer Therapeutic Strategies 2005; 6:50-61. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]