Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 34   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
EDITORIAL
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 108-110 Table of Contents   

RNTCP and tuberculosis control - High time to act


Department of Chest Diseases and TB, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, India

Date of Web Publication10-Aug-2010

Correspondence Address:
Nirmal Kumar Jain
Department of Chest Diseases and TB, SMS Medical College, Jaipur
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.68303

PMID: 20931024

Get Permissions


How to cite this article:
Jain NK. RNTCP and tuberculosis control - High time to act. Lung India 2010;27:108-10

How to cite this URL:
Jain NK. RNTCP and tuberculosis control - High time to act. Lung India [serial online] 2010 [cited 2014 Oct 22];27:108-10. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2010/27/3/108/68303

Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (RNTCP), based on the Directly Observed Therapy Short-course (DOTS) strategy, began as a pilot project in 1993 and was launched as a national program in 1997 and the entire country was covered under DOTS by 24th March 2006. [1] The program has consistently maintained the treatment success rate of more than 85% and new smear positive (NSP) case detection rate (CDR) of 70%. The DOTS strategy has been able to standardize drug regimens, prevent misuse of drugs and avoid emergence of drug resistance. [2] To achieve this, RNTCP has created a strong and vast infrastructure under it. [1]

However, recent evidences highlight the limitations that bind RNTCP and these might make control of tuberculosis a difficult task. An article by Jain et al. in this issue of journal [3] shows the efficacy of DOTS Category-I and Category-III in lymph node tuberculosis to be around 71%. Similar concerns are there about the efficacy of six-month regimen in TB-meningitis and TB of bones and joints since the implementation of DOTS with most experts recommending the duration of therapy to be around 9-12 months. [4],[5] The DOTS strategy and its regimens in extra-pulmonary tuberculosis have been the most discussed topics in the core committee's of medical colleges.

Another article by Ramachandran et al. in this issue shows that even after a decade of its implementation, still there is lack of awareness among the patients about the availability and quality of free diagnostic and treatment facilities locally under RNTCP. These patients either avail facilities from hospitals, medical colleges or private practitioners. [6] Considering the current incidence i.e. 1.9 million per year, an average of 23 million new cases of TB have occurred in last 12 years since the country-wide implementation of RNTCP in India. RNTCP has initiated nearly 10 million cases on treatment. [1] Hence, more than half of the total TB patients by pass the local RNTCP services and are either treated in private sectors or are untreated. [7] Of the 8 million doctors in India, about 6 million are engaged in private practice and only 19,000 private practitioners (0.31%) are implementing RNTCP. [1] Still most of the private physicians have practically no access to information or training programs, which accounts for surprising disparity in their management strategies. The program should ensure active involvement of the private sector in case detection and notification and provide them with the standard guidelines of TB care. Health system strengthening by clearing up of the shortage of staff and creating parallel staff for the private sector is needed. A parallel tuberculosis unit (TU) for 5 lakh population as for the government sector with all key staff can be worked out for private sector to ensure good participation as well as efficient monitoring. Medical colleges should be actively involved with activities such as training of senior health professionals and other staffs, delivery of services of RNTCP and operational research with involvement of professors of various departments especially those of orthopedics, neurology and gynecology. The procrastination regarding research in TB should end and there should be active attempts to decentralize the decisions over research in TB at medical college level.

Incidence of mono-drug resistance among new cases in India for INH is 3-32%. [8],[9] WHO recommends that in populations with known or suspected high levels of isoniazid resistance, new TB patients may receive HRE as therapy in the continuation phase as an acceptable alternative to HR. [10] Evidence shows that even adequate implementation of a National Tuberculosis Control Program can lead to selection or amplification of resistance. [11] Category I can amplify resistance to rifampicin (in initial isoniazid-resistant cases) or ethambutol and pyrazinamide (in initial MDR-TB cases). [11] Category II regimen can also amplify resistance to ethambutol or streptomycin. [11]

RNTCP has ignored some important recommendations from WHO 2003 treatment guidelines for tuberculosis and it is high time to act, accept and implement the new 2010 recommendations [10] as soon as possible. The inaccuracies in the regimen should be eliminated. Evidence now shows that new cases of extra-pulmonary TB should be treated with Category-I regimen instead of Category-III regimen for better outcome. [10] WHO 2010 recommends that national TB programs need only three standard regimens: [10]

  • new patient regimen: the regimen containing six months of rifampicin: 2HRZE/4HR
  • retreatment regimen with first line drugs: 2HRZES/1HRZE/5HRE; and
  • MDR regimen.
The estimated burden of MDR-TB under program conditions is about 1, 10, 132 cases according to the RNTCP 2008 data (i.e. 3% of fresh cases and 12-17% of retreatment cases are possibly multidrug resistant). [12] Adding to this pool are MDR-TB cases from treatment failures. Prevalence of MDR-TB among the failures of fresh cases ranges from 17 to 41% [13],[14] and among retreatment cases ranges from 32 to 86%. [15],[16] Considering that more than 50% of the new cases are not registered in RNTCP, and evaluating TB treatment practices in the private sector, the number of MDR estimates is likely to be considerably high. RNTCP DOTS-plus strategy has initiated only around 1600 MDR-TB patients on category-IV treatment. Hence there is a lot of burden to catch up. There needs to be a scaling up of the DOTS-Plus program to include all the MDR-TB patients who come to RNTCP. Given the availability of funding from international financial mechanisms, lack of resources for MDR treatment is no longer an acceptable rationale for providing a retreatment regimen of first-line drugs (the "Category II regimen") to patients with a high likelihood of MDR. [10]

There is an urgent need for strengthening reference laboratories and laboratory network equipped with newer and rapid techniques for diagnosis of TB and drug resistance available to all the patients who present to RNTCP. Specimens for culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) should be obtained from all previously treated TB patients at or before the start of treatment. DST should be performed for at least isoniazid and rifampicin. [10] In new patients, if the specimen obtained at the end of the intensive phase (month 2) is smear-positive, sputum smear microscopy should be obtained at the end of the third month. [10] In new patients, if the specimen obtained at the end of month 3 is smear-positive, sputum culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) should be performed. [10] TB patients whose treatment has failed or other patient groups with high likelihood of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) should be started on an empirical MDR regimen. [17]

Relapses are not accounted for success of regimen under RNTCP and if, disease recurrence is substantial, current end of treatment targets may be too low to bring about the expected declines in incidence. [18] The program should have a provision for a minimum follow up of one year after completion of treatment as 86% of pulmonary relapse occur in first 12 months. [19]

More than 1.3 lakh TB patients were tested for HIV and more than 20,000 (hardly 2.2% of the 0.9 million total HIV-TB pool) patients are detected to be TB-HIV co-infected. [1] HIV testing for patients with TB should be made mandatory rather than optional. Also HIV patients should be regularly screened for TB. Daily dosing is now recommended for new patients with pulmonary TB throughout the course of therapy, especially for people with HIV co-infection. [20]

A public health program must not discriminate against patients by refusing care; it is not justifiable to refuse available treatment to patients in a control program. No patient should be denied treatment under RNTCP. But forced by the circumstances, the implementation of the DOTS strategy is often success driven. [21] It is even claimed by some researchers that DOTS programs rejected patients who were unlikely to adhere to treatment. [21] A New Delhi based research revealed that 37% and 49% of eligible patients received short-course treatment in two clinics, respectively. An obsession with a target cure rate can result in all other objectives being ignored. [22] DOTS came to emphasize clinical and curative aspects and surveillance, but neglected some core public health functions that are important in any setting, and more so in pluralistic health care systems. [22]

Despite these limitations, the trends in prevalence of culture positive and smear positive TB cases in South India (monitored by the Tuberculosis Research Center, Chennai) show that the decline is very rapid during the RNTCP era when compared to the pre-RNTCP era. In India, already 47% reduction has been achieved in the tuberculosis prevalence rate and 33% reduction in mortality rate in the RNTCP era. Hence, RNTCP continues to be the national and local action and commitment that determines the degree of success in tuberculosis program.

But it is high time to act to strengthen the regimens, actively involve the private sector and medical colleges and strengthen the infrastructure for DST with availability of appropriate treatment for each and every patient suffering from tuberculosis and knocking the door of RNTCP.

 
   References Top

1.TB India 2009: RNTCP Status report. Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi - 110001. Available from: http://www.tbcindia.org . [last cited on 2009].  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Devi TS. The scientific basis of DOTS. In: Agrawal SP, Chauhan LS, editors. Tuberculosis control in India. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2005. p. 35-40.   Back to cited text no. 2      
3.NK Jain, A Bajpai, S Jain. Outcomes of category III and I in immunocompetent patients of tuberculous lymphadenopathy treated in revised national tuberculosis control programme. Lung India 2010;27:115-7  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Tuberculosis: clinical diagnosis and management of tuberculosis, and measures for its prevention and control. London, Royal College of Physicians, NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence), p. 215. Available from: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) www.nice.org.uk [last cited on 2006].  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.American Thoracic Society, CDC, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Treatment of tuberculosis. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Recommendations and Reports, Vol. 52. 2003. p. 1-77.   Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Ramachandran R, Muniyandi M, Gopi PG, Wares F. Why do tuberculosis suspects bypass local services to attend tuberculosis sanatorium? Lung India 2010;27:111-4.  Back to cited text no. 6    Medknow Journal  
7.Uplekar M, Juvekar S, Morankar S, Rangan S, Nunn P. Tuberculosis patients and practitioners in private clinics in India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:324-9.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Paramasivan CN, Venkataraman P. Drug resistance in tuberculosis in India. Indian J Med Res 2004;120:377-86.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Jain A, Mondal R, Prasad R, Singh K, Ahuja RC. Prevalence of multi-drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Med Res 2008;128:300-6.   Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Treatment of Tuberculosis-guidelines - 4 th ed. WHO/HTM/TB/2009.420. Available from: http://www.whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241547833_eng.pdf. [last cited on 2010].  Back to cited text no. 10      
11.Caminero JA. Likelihood of generating MDR-TB and XDR-TB under adequate National Tuberculosis Control Programme implementation. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2008;12:869-77.  Back to cited text no. 11      
12.Drug Resistant Tuberculosis in the South-East Asia Region- Status Report October 2009 Regional Meeting of National TB Programme Managers, WHO/SEARO, New Delhi, India, 2-5 Nov. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/linkfiles/Tuberculosis_SP-anti-TB-Drug-Resistance-SEAR.pdf. [last cited on 2009].  Back to cited text no. 12      
13.Santha T, Gopi PG, Rajeshwari R, Subramani R, Thomas A, Narayanan PR, et al. Is it worth treating category I failure patients with category II regimen? Indian J Tuberc 2005;52:203-6. Provide more authors  Back to cited text no. 13      
14.Chαvez Pachas AM, Blank R, Smith Fawzi MC, Bayona J, Becerra MC, Mitnick CD. Identifying early treatment failure on category I therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis in Lima Ciudad, Peru. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004;8:52-8.  Back to cited text no. 14      
15.Joseph P, Chandrasekaran V, Thomas A, Gopi PG, Rajeswari R, Balasubramanian R, et al. Influence of drug susceptibility on treatment outcome and susceptibility profile of ′failures′ to category II regimen. Indian J Tuberc 2006;53:141-8.  Back to cited text no. 15      
16.Shafiq M, Begum RA, Sridhar R. Drug resistance profile among post-Cat II sputum positive patients - critical analysis. In: Summaries of papers presented at the 60 th National Conference on Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases held in Lucknow, Feb 23-26, 2006. Indian J Tuberc 2006;53:163-74.  Back to cited text no. 16      
17.International Standards for Tuberculosis Care (ISTC), 2 nd ed. Tuberculosis Coalition for Technical Assistance, The Hague. Available from: http://www.istcweb.org/documents/ISTC_Report_2ndEd_Nov2009.pdf [last cited on 2009].  Back to cited text no. 17      
18.Cox HS, Morrow M, Deutschmann PW. Long term efficacy of DOTS regimens for tuberculosis: systematic review. BMJ 2008;336:484-7.  Back to cited text no. 18      
19.Thomas A, Gopi PG, Santha T, Chandrasekaran V, Subramani R, Selvakumar N, et al. Predictors of relapse among pulmonary tuberculosis patients treated in a DOTS programme in South India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005;9:556-61.  Back to cited text no. 19      
20.Menzies D, Benedetti A, Paydar A, Martin I, Royce S, Pai M, et al. Effect of duration and intermittency of rifampin on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS Med 2009;6:e1000146.   Back to cited text no. 20      
21.Singh V, Jaiswal A, Porter JD, Ogden JA, Sarin R, Sharma PP, et al. TB control, poverty, and vulnerability in Delhi, India. Trop Med Int Health 2002;7:693-700.  Back to cited text no. 21      
22.Arnadottir T. Tuberculosis and Public Health: policy and principles in tuberculosis control. A Monograph from International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union); p. 276. Available from: http://www.theunion.org/component/option,com_guide/Itemid,172/cat_id,9/guide_id,0. [last cited on 2009].  Back to cited text no. 22      



This article has been cited by
1 Ethics, human rights and programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis
Dholakia, Y.N.
Lung India. 2012; 29(1): 95-96
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2906    
    Printed134    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded488    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal