Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 758   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
  Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 393-394  

An unusual cause of bronchial obstruction


Department of Respiratory Medicine, Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Guys and Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Date of Web Publication23-Oct-2012

Correspondence Address:
Ahmed Liju
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Guys and Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.102847

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Liju A, Sharma N, Milburn H. An unusual cause of bronchial obstruction. Lung India 2012;29:393-4

How to cite this URL:
Liju A, Sharma N, Milburn H. An unusual cause of bronchial obstruction. Lung India [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Jun 17];29:393-4. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2012/29/4/393/102847

Sir,

We thank the readers for their interest in our article and the questions they brought up. [1] The diagnosis of large airway obstruction was made from clinical history, chest X-ray findings and lung function test confirming obstruction. Further to this, the patient also underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan and bronchoscopy for evaluation of the airway and sampling the nodes to rule out active or resistant tuberculosis. [2]

It perhaps would be useful if we could start to respond to questions 3 and 4 first. As you are aware, while publishing case reports, we are limited by the number of images that are allowed. The patient did indeed have left main bronchus obstruction and not below that. This was confirmed by bronchoscopy, CT scan and chest radiograph. The physiological details provided also confirm this.

In answer to question 4, may we point out that we were not describing complete obstruction, but "almost complete obstruction." The characteristic appearance of the flow volume loop (FVL) and reduction in FEV 1 and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) confirms airflow through the obstructive lesion: (1) the changes in FEV 1 , PEFR and characteristic FVL are consistent with involvement of a large airway; (2) these physiological changes, especially the FVL changes, do not occur in airways of less than 2 mm in size, i.e. a peripheral airway; (3) the physiological findings we presented are usually seen when a large airway orifice narrows to less than 80% of its caliber; [3],[4] (4) symptoms such as dyspnea usually do not occur unless the airway is reduced to under 75% of its normal lumen [5] (our patient's exercise tolerance was reduced from normal to 100 yards); and (5) on direct vision via the bronchoscope, the lesion was occluding the orifice of the left main bronchus almost completely; hence, the description of "almost complete obstruction" as opposed to complete or partial obstruction. We do acknowledge that the above features are limited to someone with an otherwise normal lung. The spirometry and FVL are not always reliable, especially if the patient has a background of obstructive airways disease.

In answer to question 3, if the patient had a lobar collapse as the questioner suspects, then the physiological changes would have been that of a lobar collapse or similar to that of a lobectomy, i.e. reduction in FEV 1 with relatively preserved or reduced vital capacity and PEFR with a normal shaped but smaller FVL. This clearly was not the case.

Moreover, on careful observation of the image published, one can see the posterior membranous tracheal wall, which helps in identifying the left and right main stem along with the main carina. Normally, there is no other view during bronchoscopy that would give such an anatomical layout. Of course, this can sometimes be confused with division of the left lower lobe and upper lobe. If, however, the obstruction was in the left lower lobe, the upper lobe would have been patent and toward the right in the given image.

The questioner was alluding to a possibility of left lower lobe basal segmental collapse. We can confirm this was not the case as: (1) basal segments have three divisions (a. anterior with medial branch; b. posterior basal; and c.lateral basal segments); there are only two divisions at the site of obstruction as can be seen; and (2) there is a necrotic lymph node protruding into the left main stem. We have not yet known a case of a lymph node eroding into basal segments that was histologically confirmed.

In answer to question 1, the lymph node was at station 7. [6] Indeed, the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy was based on chest X-ray and CT scan, as mentioned in our report [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Narrowing of the left upper lobe bronchus with mediastinal lymphadenopathy

Click here to view
Figure 2: Left main bronchus obstruction with subcarinal lymphadenopathy

Click here to view


With regard to question 2, unfortunately, the physiologist who performed the lung function post-treatment 1 year later did not record the inspiratory limb of the FVL and we therefore do not have records for this. However, it was a fixed upper airway obstruction as seen on the first measurement. When the obstruction is relieved, most often, both inspiratory and expiratory airflow improve simultaneously. The questioner is correct in assuming that the patient had not had any symptoms of dyspnea prior to development of this late paradoxical reaction.

We trust this adequately answers the queries.


   Acknowledgements Top


Dr. Ahmed Liju: diagnosed upper airway obstruction, prepared the manuscript for publication. Dr. Milburn: Diagnosed patient with tuberculosis and commenced treatment. Dr. Neel Sharma: Literature search and collected evidence and helped with manuscript.

 
   References Top

1.Mehta A. Comments on "An unusual cause of bronchial obstruction". Lung India 2012;29:300.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Liju A, Sharma N, Milburn H. An unusual cause of bronchial obstruction. Lung India 2012;29:182-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Becker HD, Mehta Atul C. Central airway obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:1278-97.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Acres JC, Kryger MH. Clinical significance of pulmonary function tests: Upper airways obstruction. Chest 1981;80:207-11.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Harley HR. Laryngotracheal obstruction complicating tracheostomy or endotracheal intubation with assisted respiration. A critical review. Thorax 1971;26:493-533.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Lardinois D, Leyn PD, Schil PV. ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:787-92.  Back to cited text no. 6
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Acknowledgements
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1431    
    Printed36    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded194    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal