Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 205   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size

  Table of Contents    
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 77-78  

Socioeconomic impact of tuberculosis on patients: Further study needed

Department of Internal Medicine, Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Date of Web Publication16-Jan-2013

Correspondence Address:
Kingsley N Ukwaja
Department of Internal Medicine, Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.106122

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Ukwaja KN. Socioeconomic impact of tuberculosis on patients: Further study needed. Lung India 2013;30:77-8

How to cite this URL:
Ukwaja KN. Socioeconomic impact of tuberculosis on patients: Further study needed. Lung India [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 May 28];30:77-8. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2013/30/1/77/106122


I read with interest the recently published article by Ananthakrishnan et al. in your journal. [1] The authors' observation that the social impact of tuberculosis (TB) was perceived by 69% of patients, economic impact by 30%, and both types of impact by 24% of the patients is very interesting. Despite the implementation of directly observed treatment short course (DOTS) strategy, the high socioeconomic impact of tuberculosis care to patients and their families is a major challenge to delivery of TB services in developing countries. [2] In India, previous studies have demonstrated high socioeconomic impact of TB care to patients even with the implementation of the DOTS strategy. [3],[4] The authors' conclusion suggests that the decentralisation of DOTS services was associated with reduction of the economic impact of TB to patients in Chennai.

I wish to present some further points that the study did not address. Patients' perception of social or economic impact may actually differ from the real socio-economic impact of TB care faced. It is not clear what economic roles families play in supporting care-seeking for TB patients. However, patients from extended family setting perceived more economic impact. [1] It might have been better to present the total, prediagnostic and postdiagnostic costs incurred by patients who perceived or did not perceive economic impact due to TB in the study. This would have suggested if there are particular thresholds of spending which when exceeded patient perceive economic impact due to TB. Also, it would have allowed us to compare patient costs of TB during the early period of DOTS compared to the current period where there is full DOTS coverage.

Similarly, perceived social impact may differ from the real social impact faced due to TB. It was very informative that more than two-thirds of the perceived social impact was because of fear, [1] this lead to failure of disclosure to family members and indeed disease transmission to some (children). Additional information which would have been very important was to inquire from the patients if they lost their job, dropped from school, had separation/divorce from spouse, or had disruption of sexual life. However, their finding points to a valuable policy implication. There is need to adjust patient/community education and counselling against fear of disclosure following TB diagnosis.

Finally, I wish to thank the authors for such an important study. I hope their findings would attract the attention of health policymakers for better control of TB in India and other developing countries.

   References Top

1.Ananthakrishnan R, Jeyaraj A, Palani G, Sathiyasekaran BW. Socioeconomic impact of TB on patients registered within RNTCP and their families in the year 2007 in Chennai, India. Lung India 2012;29:221-6. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2012/29/3/221/99103. [Last accessed on 2012 Sep 10].  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Ukwaja KN, Modebe O, Igwenyi C, Alobu I. The economic burden of tuberculosis care for patients and households in Africa: A systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2012:16;733-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Rajeswari R, Balasubramanian R, Muniyandi M, Geetharamani S, Thresa X, Venkatesan P. Socio-economic impact of tuberculosis on patient and family in India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:869-77.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Muniyandi M, Ramachandran R, Balasubramanian R. Costs to patients with tuberculosis treated under DOTS. Indian J Tuberc 2005;52;188-96.  Back to cited text no. 4


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded431    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal