Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 1925   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 336-340  

Impact of chemotherapy on symptom profile, oxidant-antioxidant balance and nutritional status in non-small cell Lung Cancer


1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Sleep Disorders, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Biochemistry, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Biostatistics, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication30-Jun-2017

Correspondence Address:
Anant Mohan
Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Sleep Disorders, AIIMS, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.209230

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Lung cancer is associated with an oxidant-antioxidant imbalance that is implicated in tumor progression. However, the association of this imbalance on disease burden and treatment response is unclear. The effect of chemotherapy on oxidative stress, antioxidant status, and nutritional profile in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was prospectively evaluated. Subjects and Methods: Patients with confirmed cytological/histological diagnosis of NSCLC were recruited. Performance status was determined using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grading and the Karnofsky Performance Scale. Skin fold anthropometry was done for nutritional assessment. All patients received chemotherapy with intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel at three-weekly intervals. Response was assessed after four cycles by repeat imaging. Plasma levels of total antioxidant status (TAS), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) levels were estimated using commercially available kits, and the change was correlated with clinical outcome, response to chemotherapy, performance status, and nutritional profile. Results: Thirty-five cases were studied (92% males), with a mean (SD) age of 56.2 (9.3) years. Following treatment, majority of patients demonstrated stable disease (n = 15 [42%]), followed by partial response (29%), progressive disease (22%), and complete remission (6%). Significant improvement occurred in respiratory symptoms. Body fat declined while subscapular skinfold thickness and 6-min walk distance increased. Spirometric values and performance status remained unchanged. GPx levels declined significantly while no notable change was observed in MDA and TAS levels. Conclusions: Chemotherapy for NSCLC improves symptoms, nutritional status, and exercise capacity but worsens the antioxidant status.

Keywords: Lung cancer, nutritional profile, oxidant-antioxidant status


How to cite this article:
Mohan A, Poulose R, Gupta T, Luthra K, Pandey RM, Madan K, Hadda V, Guleria R. Impact of chemotherapy on symptom profile, oxidant-antioxidant balance and nutritional status in non-small cell Lung Cancer. Lung India 2017;34:336-40

How to cite this URL:
Mohan A, Poulose R, Gupta T, Luthra K, Pandey RM, Madan K, Hadda V, Guleria R. Impact of chemotherapy on symptom profile, oxidant-antioxidant balance and nutritional status in non-small cell Lung Cancer. Lung India [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 May 19];34:336-40. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2017/34/4/336/209230


   Introduction Top


Lung cancer is the most common malignancy worldwide and the most common cause of cancer-related death.[1],[2] Oxidant-antioxidant imbalance is proposed as a possible mechanism for the development and propagation of lung cancer.[3],[4] Elevated levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (a marker of oxidative stress) and reduced activity of antioxidant enzymes have been detected in the blood of lung cancer patients.[5] In addition, surgical removal of the lung tumor has led to increased total body antioxidant status, implying a possible association between the presence of lung cancer cells and circulating antioxidant levels.[6] The administration of chemotherapy is also associated with increased free radicals and decreased antioxidants.[7],[8] This oxidant-antioxidant imbalance plays a role in the side effects of chemotherapy drugs as well,[9] for example, cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.[10]

Nutritional assessment is an important outcome variable in most lung cancer trials.[11],[12] In lung cancer, weight loss, malnutrition, and skeletal muscle depletion indicate poor treatment response and contribute to morbidity and mortality.[13],[14],[15] However, the inter-relationship between oxidant-antioxidant balance and malnutrition, as well as their association with various clinical parameters, including response to treatment is unclear as yet. This study thus aims to look at the effect of chemotherapy on oxidative stress, antioxidant status, and nutritional profile in patients undergoing treatment for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).


   Subjects and Methods Top


This prospective, observational study was carried out over a period of 3 years from February 1, 2011, to January 31, 2014. Patients with confirmed cytological/histological diagnosis of NSCLC were screened. All the patients were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (7th edition) tumor-node-metastasis classification and those eligible for chemotherapy (Stage IIIB and IV) were recruited after obtaining informed consent.[16] Patients with any other serious medical or psychiatric condition or those who had received any prior chemotherapy were excluded from the study.

All patients were evaluated twice during the study period, once before and once at the completion of the fourth cycle of chemotherapy. Symptoms were quantified using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), which consists of six symptom items and three general items, each ranging from zero (no symptoms) to 100 (worst).[17] Patient demographics, clinical history, physical examination, and smoking history were obtained using a structured pro forma. Based on their smoking status, patients were grouped as current smokers, former smokers (those who had quit smoking for at least the last 6 months), or nonsmokers (lifetime smoking index <100). The extent of smoking was measured by calculating the smoking index (smoking index = [number of cigarettes/bidis smoked per day] × [years as a smoker]) (bidi: A small hand-rolled often flavored cigarette made chiefly in India). Performance status was determined using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) grading, as well as the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), which consists of an 11-point scale ranging from zero (dead) to 100 (asymptomatic with normal activities) and categorizes a patient according to the ability to carry out routine work.[18],[19] The 6-min walk test was administered according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 2002 guidelines and spirometry was performed using the FLOWHANDDY ZAN 100 USB machine (Germany) in accordance to the ATS 1995 recommendations.[20],[21] Prior ethical clearance was obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee. Tissue was tested for mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); patients who tested positive for activating EGFR mutations were prescribed targeted therapy with gefitinib and excluded from subsequent analysis.

All patients were administered a doublet chemotherapy regimen consisting of carboplatin AUC 6 intravenous (IV) on day 1 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV on day 1, at three-weekly intervals. This regimen was chosen primarily because these drugs were available free for the patients in our hospital for majority of their treatment course. Patients were put on other regimens such as carboplatin-gemcitabine; their numbers, however, were few and hence were not included for analysis. Response to chemotherapy was assessed at the end of four cycles by repeat computed tomography scan and as per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria version 1.1 which is a set of published rules that define when cancer patients improve (“complete responders [CR] or partial responders [PR]”), stay the same (“stable disease” [SD]), or worsen (“progressive disease” [PD]) during treatments.[22] CR and PR were together classified as “responders” while SD and PD clubbed as “nonresponders.” The overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the sum of CR and PR, and disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the sum of CR, PR, and stable disease.

Measurement of oxidative stress

Blood samples were collected in heparinized vials by sterile venipuncture before the institution of chemotherapy and at the end of the fourth cycle. Plasma was prepared by immediate centrifugation for 10 min at 1600 xg and 4°C and was immediately stored at −20°C until further use. Total antioxidant status (TAS), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) levels were estimated using commercially available kits according to the manufacturer's protocol in the plasma collected. The normal limits of these were taken as: TAS, ref. range1.30–1.77 mmol/l; MDA ref range <1.5 units; GPx ref range: 4171–1088 IU/l. The change in TAS, MDA, and GPx between pre- and post-treatment was calculated and correlated with clinical outcome, response to chemotherapy, performance status, and nutritional profile.

Assessment of nutritional profile

All patients were weighed, their waist and hip measurements were taken, and the mid-upper arm circumference and skinfold thickness (biceps, triceps, subscapular, suprailiac) were measured before the start of chemotherapy and at the end of the fourth cycle. Basal metabolic rate (BMR), total body water (TBW), fat mass, and fat-free mass (FFM) were calculated by bioelectric impedance method using Tanita TBF-300 body composition analyzer, Tanita Corp., IL, USA.

Statistical analysis

Data were managed on Excel spreadsheets. Descriptive statistics was used to determine the frequency of symptoms, ECOG and KPS. Mean and SD were calculated for continuous variables. When the F-value indicated significant differences between group means, post hoc pairwise multiple comparisons were performed using Bonferroni method. Pearson's correlation coefficient was computed to assess relationship between two quantitative variables. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. All the statistical tests done in this study were two-tailed. STATA 11.0 version for Windows (STATA Corporation, College Station Road, Houston, Texas, USA) was used for data analysis.


   Results Top


During the study period, 47 subjects with NSCLC were recruited at baseline before initiation of chemotherapy. Of these, 35 subjects completed four cycles and were ultimately included for analysis. The remaining patients either died before completing four cycles or were advised discontinuation in view of worsening performance status. The final study group included 32 males (91%), with a mean (SD) age of 56.2 (9.3) years and median symptom duration of 510 days (range, 42–620 days). For the smokers, the median smoking index was 224 (range, 0-1150). The most common symptoms were chest pain (83%), cough (77%), shortness of breath (77%), loss of weight (54%), and weakness (54%). Majority had Stage IV disease (63%), followed by Stage IIIB (20%), and Stage IIIA (17%). Nineteen patients (54.3%) had a KPS score between 80 and 100, and 16 patients (45.7%) between 50 and 70. Twenty-one patients (60%) had an ECOG performance Grade I, 12 (34.3%) had Grade II, and 2 (5.7%) had Grade 0. A pre- and post-chemotherapy comparison of various clinical characteristics is shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Clinicolaboratory characteristics (n=35)

Click here to view


A significant reduction was observed in the LCSS scores for shortness of breath, cough, sputum, hemoptysis, and chest pain after four cycles of chemotherapy compared to pretreatment values. No significant difference was observed in KPS/ECOG, pulmonary functions, BMI, BMR, impedance, FFM, TBW, or anthropometric values (except subscapular skinfold thickness). However, significant improvement was noted in the 6-min walk distance. Among body composition parameters, body fat percentage showed significant decline following treatment.

Plasma GPx levels declined significantly while no notable change was observed in MDA and TAS levels [Table 1].

At the completion of four cycles of chemotherapy, majority of patients documented stable disease (43%), followed by PR (28%), PD (23%), and CR (6%). Based on this, 12 patients (34%) were classified as responders and 23 (66%) as nonresponders. The ORR and DCR of the study group were 35% and 77%, respectively. No significant correlation was seen between the baseline levels of TAS, MDA, and GPx with response to treatment. Similarly, no difference in these parameters was observed between responders and nonresponders.


   Discussion Top


Our findings suggest that after four cycles of chemotherapy, mean levels of GPx decreased significantly while no significant changes were observed in MDA and TAS. There was a significant improvement in symptoms and exercise capacity as assessed by the distance walked in 6 minutes. A significant deterioration of the nutritional profile as evidenced by the decline in body fat and subscapular skinfold thickness was also observed.

GPx-1 is the major antioxidant enzyme in lung lining fluid and acts to prevent the initiation of cancer by reactive oxygen species-mediated DNA damage and is a powerful scavenger of harmful reactive oxygen and nitrogen free radical compounds.[23] Previous studies suggest that GPx-1 is altered in several types of cancer cells and its overexpression propagates antitumorigenic effect by eliminating oxidants.[24]

MDA is one of the most frequently measured biomarkers to indicate the level of overall lipid peroxidation.[25] TAS is defined as the sum of endogenous and food-derived antioxidants in the extracellular fluid of an individual and provides a better-integrated index of antioxidant activity, as compared to one based on simple summation of measurable antioxidants.[26]

In majority of previous reports, assessment of the antioxidant status in lung cancer has been carried out by measuring various vitamins and individual antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and GPx. Malignant pleural exudates have demonstrated increased lipid peroxidation and lower antioxidant status than nonmalignant fluids.[27] A recent study conducted in 58 NSCLC patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy found results similar to our study by demonstrating that patients had significantly elevated prechemotherapy levels of reactive oxygen metabolites (ROM) compared with normal healthy subjects; postchemotherapy, ROM production was suppressed in responders but not in nonresponders.[28] The effect of chemotherapy on antioxidant status was evaluated in 12 patients with SCLC by measuring plasma levels of total radical antioxidant parameter (TRAP), Vitamins C and E.[29] Significant decline in plasma TRAP and Vitamin C levels was observed 8 h after initiation of chemotherapy. However, this study had some important drawbacks, in that sample size was small and patients were not stratified according to treatment received or smoking status. A meta-analysis was conducted after including all studies that investigated antioxidant levels in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.[30] This analysis eventually suggested that chemotherapy lowered TAS but accepted that the available evidence was limited and results too inconsistent to be extrapolated to individual cancers.

In our study group, the low baseline levels of antioxidants may be due to the effect of lung cancer itself. It has been previously shown that cancer patients have lower levels and activity of antioxidants such as SOD and catalase than controls, even before initiating treatment.[31]

The worsening of antioxidant status after chemotherapy may be either due to the oxidative stress generated by the chemotherapy drugs, due to tumor progression, or both. Many classes of anti-neoplastic agents including the platinum coordination complexes, most alkylating agents, epipodophyllotoxins, and camptothecins are known to generate high levels of oxidative stress.[32] Poor dietary intake of antioxidants may be another contributing factor for low TAS levels although this was not assessed in our study. In fact, the impact of dietary intake and supplementation with various antioxidants and nutrients on their circulating levels has not been conclusively demonstrated in cancer.

Impaired intestinal absorption could be a possible cause of the worsening oxidant-antioxidant status following chemotherapy; however, it seems unlikely since the mean body weight did not significantly change in our study group after chemotherapy. In addition, no evidence of hepatic derangement or intestinal malabsorption was observed, which otherwise could have explained the low baseline antioxidant levels. Other causes, such as cisplatin which induced renal proximal tubular damage and decreased renal tubular reabsorption of water-soluble antioxidants such as uric acid, may also have contributed to the lowered antioxidant status but could not be assessed as part of this study.

The median age of our patients was similar to previous studies done in Indian population.[33] Although performance status did not change markedly, significant improvement in clinical symptoms was observed in our patients following treatment. This observation contrasts with previous studies, where symptomatic improvement was accompanied by a concomitant enhancement in performance status.[13] In addition, significant increase was observed in the 6-min walk distance, implying improvement in exercise capacity. The improvement in exercise capacity in the form of 6-min walk distance, following treatment, has been observed in previous studies as well and shows a good correlation with performance status and survival. No significant change was observed in spirometric parameters among our patients, implying discordance between subjective symptom severity with objective measures of pulmonary function. No correlation was found between the oxidant-antioxidant status and the exercise capacity or the anthropometric parameters.

Malnutrition is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in lung cancer and may have an impact on the clinical course. Weight loss is a common symptom of lung cancer and closely linked to survival.[11] Our study demonstrated a significant decline in body fat after four cycles of chemotherapy, implying thereby a worsening of postchemotherapy nutritional status.

Assessment of body fat and body composition following chemotherapy has not been extensively studied and published reports show contrasting results. A previous study in NSCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy demonstrated a significant increase in triceps and suprailiac skin fold thicknesses after four cycles.[13] In our patient group, the mean BMI and waist circumference reduced, albeit nonsignificantly, after treatment whereas the hip circumference and subscapular thickness increased, possibly indicating a redistribution of body fat. Similar results were found in an earlier publication by our group, wherein chemotherapy resulted in improvement in symptoms, nutritional profile, and quality of life.[13] The low fat following chemotherapy could be due to poor diet, due to the disease itself, or both. Larger studies including dietary assessment may be useful to resolve this issue.

This study was limited by its small sample size and hence, was not adequately powered to detect the differences in the oxidant-antioxidant status between different stages of lung cancer. A detailed dietary intake was not available for analysis, and a matched control group was lacking. For reasons mentioned previously, our predominant chemotherapy regimen was carboplatin-paclitaxel and thus we could not compare changes in antioxidant status between two different drug regimens. Studies with a larger sample size need to explore these findings further as they may have a direct effect on the clinical course and treatment outcomes. In spite of these shortcomings, the above results may provide useful insights into the trends in oxidant-antioxidant balance in patients with lung cancer and their association with various clinical and nutritional parameters.


   Conclusions Top


The findings of this study indicate that platinum-based doublet chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC is associated with a decline in the antioxidant status but improves symptoms; however, this does not translate into similar benefit in respiratory indices or nutritional status.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a research grant from the University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi. We would also like to acknowledge the valuable contribution of Ms. Ekta Sarwan in the preparation of this manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

Educational grant from the University Grants Commission (UGC) supported the work.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Kimman M, Norman R, Jan S, Kingston D, Woodward M. The burden of cancer in member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:411-20.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Soerjomataram I, Lortet-Tieulent J, Parkin DM, Ferlay J, Mathers C, Forman D, et al. Global burden of cancer in 2008: A systematic analysis of disability-adjusted life-years in 12 world regions. Lancet 2012;380:1840-50.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Gupta RK, Patel AK, Kumari R, Chugh S, Shrivastav C, Mehra S, et al. Interactions between oxidative stress, lipid profile and antioxidants in breast cancer: A case control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:6295-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kinnula VL, Pääkkö P, Soini Y. Antioxidant enzymes and redox regulating thiol proteins in malignancies of human lung. FEBS Lett 2004;569:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gromadzinska J, Wasowicz W, Rydzynski K, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N. Oxidative-stress markers in blood of lung cancer patients occupationally exposed to carcinogens. Biol Trace Elem Res 2003;91:203-15.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Erhola M, Nieminen MM, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Huusari H, Alanko K, Metsä-Ketelä T, et al. Effects of surgical removal of lung cancer on total plasma antioxidant capacity in lung cancer patients. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 1998;17:219-25.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Johns NP, Johns JR. Assessment of 8-isoprostane (8-isoPGF2a) in urine of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing chemotherapy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:775-80.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Stathopoulos D, Loukides S, Syrigos K. 8-Isoprostane in exhaled breath condensate of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: The effect of chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 2014;34:5143-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Kaya E, Keskin L, Aydogdu I, Kuku I, Bayraktar N, Erkut MA. Oxidant/antioxidant parameters and their relationship with chemotherapy in Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Int Med Res 2005;33:687-92.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Baliga R, Ueda N, Walker PD, Shah SV. Oxidant mechanisms in toxic acute renal failure. Drug Metab Rev 1999;31:971-97.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ferrigno D, Buccheri G. Anthropometric measurements in non-small-cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 2001;9:522-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gordon JN, Green SR, Goggin PM. Cancer cachexia. QJM 2005;98:779-88.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mohan A, Singh P, Kumar S, Mohan C, Pathak AK, Pandey RM, et al. Effect of change in symptoms, respiratory status, nutritional profile and quality of life on response to treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2008;9:557-62.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Martin L, Birdsell L, Macdonald N, Reiman T, Clandinin MT, McCargar LJ, et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: Skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:1539-47.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kimura M, Naito T, Kenmotsu H, Taira T, Wakuda K, Oyakawa T, et al. Prognostic impact of cancer cachexia in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 2015;23:1699-708.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, editors. AJCC Lung. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Springer; 2010. p. 253-70.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Hollen PJ, Gralla RJ, Kris MG, Cox C, Belani CP, Grunberg SM, et al. Measurement of quality of life in patients with lung cancer in multicenter trials of new therapies. Psychometric assessment of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. Cancer 1994;73:2087-98.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982;5:649-55.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH, editor. The Clinical Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents 1949 Symposium, Microbiology Section. New York: Academy of Medicine; 1949. p. 191-205.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:111-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Standardization of spirometry, update. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1107-36.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228-47.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Cross CE, van der Vliet A, O'Neill CA, Louie S, Halliwell B. Oxidants, antioxidants, and respiratory tract lining fluids. Environ Health Perspect 1994;102 Suppl 10:185-91.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Gladyshev VN, Factor VM, Housseau F, Hatfield DL. Contrasting patterns of regulation of the antioxidant selenoproteins, thioredoxin reductase, and glutathione peroxidase, in cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998;251:488-93.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Church DF, Pryor WA. Free-radical chemistry of cigarette smoke and its toxicological implications. Environ Health Perspect 1985;64:111-26.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Motoyama T, Okamoto K, Kukita I, Hamaguchi M, Kinoshita Y, Ogawa H. Possible role of increased oxidant stress in multiple organ failure after systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1048-52.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Vanisree AJ, Shyamaladevi CS. Status of lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in malignant (bronchogenic carcinoma) and non-malignant pleural effusions. Indian J Cancer 1999;36:127-34.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Wakabayashi T, Kawashima T, Matsuzawa Y. Evaluation of reactive oxygen metabolites in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after chemotherapy. Multidiscip Respir Med 2014;9:44.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Erhola M, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Metsä-Ketelä T, Alanko K, Nieminen MM. Effects of anthracyclin-based chemotherapy on total plasma antioxidant capacity in small cell lung cancer patients. Free Radic Biol Med 1996;21:383-90.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Ladas EJ, Jacobson JS, Kennedy DD, Teel K, Fleischauer A, Kelly KM. Antioxidants and cancer therapy: A systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:517-28.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Chung-man Ho J, Zheng S, Comhair SA, Farver C, Erzurum SC. Differential expression of manganese superoxide dismutase and catalase in lung cancer. Cancer Res 2001;61:8578-85.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Conklin KA. Dietary antioxidants during cancer chemotherapy: Impact on chemotherapeutic effectiveness and development of side effects. Nutr Cancer 2000;37:1-18.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Malik PS, Sharma MC, Mohanti BK, Shukla NK, Deo S, Mohan A, et al. Clinico-pathological profile of lung cancer at AIIMS: A changing paradigm in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:489-94.  Back to cited text no. 33
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1097    
    Printed7    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded185    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal