Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 8   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 35  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 116-120  

Etiology of community acquired pneumonia among children in India with special reference to atypical pathogens


1 Department of Pediatrics, JSS Medical College, JSS University, Mysore, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Microbiology, JSS Medical College, JSS University, Mysore, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication27-Feb-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. K Jagadish Kumar
85/B, 9th Cross, Navilu Road, Kuvempu Nagar, Mysore - 570 023, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_391_16

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Objectives: The aim is to identify the etiology of community acquired pneumonia in children with special reference to atypical bacteria and viruses. Materials and Methods: A total of 94 pneumonia children were enrolled in the study. Sixty-seven did not have an etiological diagnosis by conventional culture. These children were subjected to immunofluorescence assay by Pneumoslide IgM. Results: Ninety-four children were evaluated for etiology by conventional culture. Twenty-seven of them had the bacteriological diagnosis. Rest 67 were further analyzed for causative organism using Pneumoslide immunofluorescence test. Among this group, 38 (56.7%) had etiological diagnosis. Atypical bacteria were identified in 23 cases, most common being Mycoplasma pneumoniae and which was more common between 5 months and 2 years of age. Viruses were identified in 19 cases, and the most common virus was Respiratory syncytial virus. Mixed pathogens were identified in five children., M. pneumoniae was the common offending agent. Conclusions: Atypical bacteria and viruses play an important role as etiological agents in pneumonia in children. Pneumoslide IgM is useful for rapid detection of atypical bacteria and viruses.

Keywords: Atypical bacteria, etiology, pneumonia, Pneumoslide IgM, viruses


How to cite this article:
Kumar K J, Ashok Chowdary K V, Usha H C, Kulkarni M, Manjunath V G. Etiology of community acquired pneumonia among children in India with special reference to atypical pathogens. Lung India 2018;35:116-20

How to cite this URL:
Kumar K J, Ashok Chowdary K V, Usha H C, Kulkarni M, Manjunath V G. Etiology of community acquired pneumonia among children in India with special reference to atypical pathogens. Lung India [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 8];35:116-20. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2018/35/2/116/226218




   Introduction Top


Acute respiratory tract infections are the largest cause of morbidity and mortality among under-five children worldwide.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5] In India, pneumonia is the single most important cause of death among children in the postneonatal period, accounting for 27.5% of mortality among under-five children.[1] In India, there are only a few systematic review or studies regarding the etiology of pneumonia in children.[1],[4] In general, the etiology can be identified in only 30%–50% of cases using conventional methods.[5] This lack of information leads to inappropriate use of antibiotics with consequent antibiotic resistance and increased cost.[5] In community acquired pneumonia (CAP) it is not possible to clinically or radiologically to distinguish between the etiological agents[6],[7] and hence, serological diagnosis would be very helpful. IgM antibodies which appears after infection are more valuable for the early diagnosis in children.[5] Pneumoslide-M test (indirect immunofluorescence assays [IFAs]) which detects the IgM antibodies against nine pathogens has reasonable sensitivity and specificity.[8] The aim of this study is to find the etiology of CAP in children with special reference to atypical bacteria and viruses by utilizing Pneumoslide-M test.


   Materials and Methods Top


This study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics at JSS Hospital, Mysore. Children aged 2 months to 16 years admitted with clinical diagnosis of pneumonia as defined by WHO,[9] were included after obtaining the informed written consent of the parents/guardians. Clearance for the study was obtained from JSS Medical College Ethical Committee.

Sample size

Indian studies have shown the prevalence of atypical organisms in CAP to be about 10%. Considering this prevalence, margin of error of 5% and confidence level of 90%, we had to recurit 97 patients for this study. Sample size was calculated using online calculator raosoft available on http://www.raosoft.com/© 1996–2011 by Raosoft, Inc. We were able to recruit 94 pneumonia children in the study. Of them, 67 did not grow any bacteria through different conventional culture methods and were processed for Pneumoslide IgM test [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Enrollment of community acquired pneumonia children for Pneumoslide IgM test

Click here to view


Study period

From July 1, 2015 to September 2015, all the CAP cases were included till the sample size was attained. Nosocomial and aspiration pneumonias were excluded from the study.

Sample collection

Blood sample was taken for complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein and blood culture. Sputum was collected on 3 consecutive mornings after giving saline nebulization/nasogastric aspiration cultures collected on 3 consecutive mornings. Nasal/ear discharge swabs were collected if required for cultures. Chest X-ray was taken at the time of admission.

If the conventional cultures revealed a typical bacteria, they were excluded. Rest of the cases were processed for Pneumoslide IgM to identify atypical bacteria and viruses [Figure 1].

Pneumoslide-M

Blood was collected, serum separated and was subjected to indirect SIR test. Pneumoslide-M-Vircell slide-Granada, Spain10 slides of 10 wells (9 etilogical + 1 control). Manufacturer's test protocol was followed during testing and result interpretation. IFA detects IgM antibodies of the etiological agents of respiratory tract infection (Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza A and B and parainfluenza serotypes 1, 2, and 3). The specific antibodies react with the antigen, the antigen-antibody complexes react with the fluorescein-labeled anti-human globulin. It can be examined using an immunofluorescence microscope [Figure 2].
Figure 2: IgM antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae showing perinuclear fluorescence

Click here to view


Data entry, database management, and statistical analysis were performed using Epi-Info software version 7 (Atlanta, GA, USA). All qualitative variables were expressed as proportions with confidence intervals and quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Chi-square was used for finding association between qualitative variables.


   Results Top


Ninety-four CAP were enrolled in our study and most of the cases belong to 5 months to 2 years of age [Table 1]. Of the 94 pneumonia children, in 27 cases bacterias were isolated from different conventional culture methods (ear/nasal/discharge swab cultures/sputum/nasogastric aspiration cultures) and the common bacterias isolated being Streptococcus pneumonia e,  Staphylococcus haemolyticus Scientific Name Search  pseudomonas aeroginosa. Blood cultures were sterile in all 94 cases. Rest of the 67 cases were processed for immune florescence assay using Pneumoslide IgM. Of which, 38 (56.7%) children were positive for various atypical bacterial and viral agents causing CAP [Figure 1].
Table 1: Age distribution in community acquired pneumonia children and the common pathogens identified by using Pneumoslide IgM

Click here to view


Atypical bacterial agents were identified in 23 cases, most common being M. pneumoniae and which was more common between 5 months and 2 years of age [Table 1] and [Table 2].
Table 2: Pathogens identified by using Pneumoslide IgM in community acquired pneumonia children (n=67)

Click here to view


Viruses causing CAP was identified using Pneumoslide IgM in 19 cases, and the most common virus identified was RSV. Most of the RSV occurred between 5 months and 2 years of age (90%) [Table 1] and [Table 2]. Mixed pathogens were identified in four children, M. pneumoniae is the common offending agent [Table 2]. In one child with CAP, M. pneumoniae was isolated along with H1N1 influenza virus by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the nasopharngeal secretions.

Out of 94 children enrolled, 92 cases were discharged and there were two mortalities. Pathogens isolated from the expired cases were RSV and another child of mixed infection (M. pneumoniae with H1N1).


   Discussion Top


The primary pathogens as the cause of CAP include typical bacteria, atypical bacteria, and viruses.[1],[3],[8] Etiology varies from country to country, with respect to age and could be due to differences in seasons as well.[3],[8] Ideally, it is desirable to isolate the responsible organism. However, the pathogen is not identified in a significant proportion of cases that otherwise meet the clinical definition of CAP.[6] The etiological diagnosis cannot be made in 50% of the patients even after extensive diagnostic tests.[11] The pathogen was isolated only in 29% of the patients with standard sputum and blood cultures in a study carried out by Shah et al.[11] It is a challenge for both clinician and microbiologist to determine the etiology of pneumonia due to the relative inaccessibility of infected tissue (lung) and the difficulty in obtaining noncontaminated the upper airway samples. Other practical problems encountered include, low yield of blood cultures and difficulty in obtaining adequate sputum/bronchoalveolar lavage in children.[3],[5],[6] In general, atypical bacteria are difficult to isolate.[2] Since 2000, the diagnostic yield has improved with a pathogen identified in 65%–86% of CAP.[6] In the recent years with the development of new laboratory technologies, it was observed that the role of virus and atypical bacteria as the cause of respiratory tract infection were under estimated.[8] None of the blood cultures were positive in the present study. As such blood cultures are positive in 10%–20% of children with pneumonia and S. pneumoniae is cultured in the blood in <5%.[7] In a study from India, out of 2345 CAP children, naso pharyngeal aspiration (NPA) and blood cultures yielded bacteria in only 13.9% and 2.1% of children, respectively.[4] We excluded a few cases from the Pneumoslide IgM test as they grew organisms from airways/nasal secretions using conventional methods and however, they may be just commensals and not represent the causative organism. In another Indian study, out of the 180 CAP in under-five children, at least one bacterial pathogen was detected in 116 (64.4%) cases using conventional and molecular methods. S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were the most common bacterial pathogens and atypical bacteria accounted for about 10% of cases.[12] Ji et al. could identify at least one type of pathogen in 5871 (57.32%) out of 10,243 hospitalized acute respiratory infections (ARI) children by utilising the NPA and serum samples for multi-pathogen detection. They found that 32.47% were due to virus, which were detected by direct IFA, 28.02% bacteria and 26.94% due to atypical pathogens detected by fluorescent quantitative PCR. M. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen identified (25.74%).[13]

Throughout the world, there is increasing recognition of atypical pathogens such as M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae and L. pneumophila as important causes of CAP.[2],[5] They are respononsible for 10%–30% of CAP in children.[2],[5] Atypical organisms have been rarely isolated from CAP patients mainly because of lack of facilities for culture/serology of these organisms.[14] In our study, we identified atypical bacterial pathogens as the cause for CAP in 34.3% of children using Pneumoslide IgM. M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae and L. pneumophila were detected in 28.3%, 4.4%, and 1.1% of cases, respectively. Since 2000 detection of M. pneumoniae in children show remarkable consistency, with rates varies from 27% to 36%, whereas Chlamydia pneumoniae is responsible for 5% to 14% of cases.[6]M. pneumoniae is most often identified in older children.[6]Mycoplasma is not unusual in children aged 1–5 years, but Baer observed 22% incidence of M. pneumoniae in children aged 1–3 years.[6] In a study from Vietnam also, the highest proportion of atypical pathogens causing CAP and of particularly severe CAP due to atypical pathogens occurred in children younger than 2 years. M. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen in severe form of atypical CAP.[2] Of the 19 cases of M. pneumoniae identified in the present study, 68.4% were below 2 years of age which is comparable to Vietnam study.[2]M. pneumoniae is the common pathogen in all the age groups in various studies but was more frequent in children older than 1 year.[3],[5],[8]

Pathogens isolated using Pneumoslide IgM in CAP in various other studies are depicted in [Table 3]. M. pneumoniae was the most frequent pathogen isolated which is similar to our study. All these studies have not used conventional methods to detect typical bacteria but used only Pneumoslide-M test. Probably by not using conventional culture methods, they would have missed the typical pathogens of CAP.
Table 3: Pathogens isolated by using Pneumoslide IgM in community acquired pneumonia in other studies

Click here to view


The viruses were identified as etiological agents in 19 cases of CAP children and RSV was the most common virus identified in this study. Viruses cause a significant percentage of CAP infections, especially in children younger than 2 years and the prevalence of viral pneumonia decreases with age.[6],[8],[13] Viral etiologies accounts for CAP in up to 80% of children younger than 2 years.[8] RSV is consistently the most frequently detected virus, representing up to 40% in <2 years, but rarely identified in older children.[15] Similar observation was made in our study also and 90% of RSV occurred in <2-year-old. However, the highest detection rate of RSV, was seen in the 3–6-year-old group in a study by Wu et al.[3] In a study from China, out of 30,443 ARI children, 4428 (14.55%) were positive for at least one virus using direct immunofluorescence assay from nasopharyngeal swabs. The common viruses identified were RSV (68.11%), adenovirus (16.01%), and parainfluenza virus 3 (11%).[16]

Overall we found mixed infection in five children with CAP and M. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen associated with co-infection. Various studies have noted mixed viral and bacterial infections in 8%–40% of cases.[3],[6] In most of the studies also mycoplasma is the most common offending agent similar to our study.[2],[3],[5],[8] Liu et al. observed mixed infection in 2391 children out of 39,756 children and the most common agent observed in the co-infections were M. pneumoniae and influenza B virus.[5] Chen et al. also observed mixed infection in 6.56% of children.[8] Some viruses cause extensive damage to the epithelium of the respiratory tract which might promote super infection by another virus.[5] Probably infection by one (potential) pathogen facilitates other pathogens. This is well documented with influenza infection.[8] According to one hypotheses, patients infected with mycoplasma may be susceptible to other infectious pathogens.[8] Pathogens isolated from the death cases were RSV and another child of mixed infection (M. pneumoniae with influenza A H1N1 virus).

Limitation of our study

We excluded 27 cases from the Pneumoslide IgM test, as they grew organisms from airways using conventional methods, which may be commensals. We used only basic conventional methods (not molecular) to identify typical bacteria. The Pneumoslide IgM test could detect only viral and atypical bacterial pathogens. It could not identify bacterial pathogens.


   Conclusions Top


Atypical bacterias and viruses play an important role as aetiological agents in CAP in children. The study highlights the usefulness of Pneumoslide IgM as a multi panel test for rapid detection of atypical bacteria and viruses, knowledge of which is valuable to ensure prompt initiation of targeted therapy.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Dr. Narayanappa D, Head of the Pediatric Department, Dr. Ravi, vice pricipal, Dr. Basavanagowdappa, principal of JSS Medical College, for their constant support and encouragement. We are also thankful to Dr. Srinivasamurthy, professor of paediatrics, for his guidance and reviewing the manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Mathew JL, Patwari AK, Gupta P, Shah D, Gera T, Gogia S, et al. Acute respiratory infection and pneumonia in India: A systematic review of literature for advocacy and action: UNICEF-PHFI series on newborn and child health, India. Indian Pediatr 2011;48:191-218.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Huong Ple T, Hien PT, Lan NT, Binh TQ, Tuan DM, Anh DD. First report on prevalence and risk factors of severe atypical pneumonia in Vietnamese children aged 1-15 years. BMC Public Health 2014;14:1304.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Wu Z, Li Y, Gu J, Zheng H, Tong Y, Wu Q. Detection of viruses and atypical bacteria associated with acute respiratory infection of children in Hubei, China. Respirology 2014;19:218-24.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Mathew JL, Singhi S, Ray P, Hagel E, Saghafian-Hedengren S, Bansal A, et al. Etiology of community acquired pneumonia among children in India: Prospective, cohort study. J Glob Health 2015;5:050418.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Liu J, Ai H, Xiong Y, Li F, Wen Z, Liu W, et al. Prevalence and correlation of infectious agents in hospitalized children with acute respiratory tract infections in Central China. PLoS One 2015;10:e0119170.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
6. Harris M, Clark J, Coote N, Fletcher P, Harnden A, McKean M, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in children: Update 2011. Thorax 2011;66 Suppl 2:ii1-23.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Acute Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia. Infants and Children Clinical Practice Guideline. NSW Health Guideline Summary. 1st ed. North Sydney: NSW Health; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Chen K, Jia R, Li L, Yang C, Shi Y. The aetiology of community associated pneumonia in children in Nanjing, China and aetiological patterns associated with age and season. BMC Public Health 2015;15:113.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
WHO. Acute Respiratory Infections in Children. Case Management in Small Hospitals in Developing Countries. A Manual for Doctors and Other Health Workers, WHO/ARI/90.5; 1990. Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/61873. [Last accessed on 2016 Jun 06].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lin ZF, Zhao MQ, Guo M, Kuang L, Wang CB, Lian GW, et al. The Seroprevalence of Some Pathogen Specific IgM in Children with Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Guangzhou Region, 2011-2012. Clin Lab 2015;61:917-24.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Shah BA, Singh G, Naik MA, Dhobi GN. Bacteriological and clinical profile of Community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients. Lung India 2010;27:54-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
12.
Das A, Patgiri SJ, Saikia L, Dowerah P, Nath R. Bacterial pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia in children aged below five years. Indian Pediatr 2016;53:225-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Ji W, Chen ZR, Zhou WF, Sun HM, Li BQ, Cai LH, et al. Etiology of acute respiratory tract infection in hospitalized children in Suzhou from 2005 to 2011. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2013;47:497-503.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Bedi RS. Community acquired pneumonia-typical or atypical? Lung India 2006;23:130-1.  Back to cited text no. 14
  [Full text]  
15.
Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, Alverson B, Carter ER, Harrison C, et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: Clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:e25-76.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Wang H, Zheng Y, Deng J, Wang W, Liu P, Yang F, et al. Prevalence of respiratory viruses among children hospitalized from respiratory infections in Shenzhen, China. Virol J 2016;13:39.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1846    
    Printed23    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded315    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal