Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 1202   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 319-323  

Prognostic influence of toll-like receptor 4 gene polymorphism into community-acquired pneumonia course among young patients with cytomegalovirus persistence


1 Department of Infectious Diseases, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
2 Department of Propedeutics of Internal Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
3 Department of Paediatric, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine

Date of Web Publication28-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kiarina D Chichirelo-Konstantynovych
Khmelnitsky Highway Str., 122a/33, Vinnytsya 21029
Ukraine
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_355_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the predictive role of TLR4 polymorphism in CAP course among young cytomegalovirus-positive patients. Subjects and Methods: One hundred and five patients with pneumonia (age range: 18–44 years) and 61 healthy respondents were observed clinically and specifically (by cytomegalovirus markers and TLR4 + 3725 G/C polymorphism). Results: Among CAP patients, there were 51 male (48.6%) and 54 female (51.4%), with average age 34.1 ± 0.8 years, and there were 19 (18.1%) patients with Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) I, 46 (43.8%) patients with PORT II, 31 (29.5%) patients with PORT III, and 9 (8.6%) patients with PORT IV. Cytomegalovirus persistence was detected in 80 (48.2%) patients and 34 (20.5%) healthy respondents (P = 0.003). G/G genotype of TLR4 signaling was found in 78 (74%) patients with pneumonia, G/C in 24 (23%) patients, and C/C in 3 (3%) patients. Among G/C patients, there were 16.2% cytomegalovirus-positive patients versus 6.7% negative patients (P < 0.05), as well as among G/G patients, and there were 59% versus 15,2%, accordingly (P < 0.01). The patients of the main group with G/G genotype were characterized by mostly mild (PORT I – 15 [14.3%]) and moderate pneumonia severity (PORT II – 32 [30.5%] and PORT III – 26 [24.8%] patients). The patients with G/C genotype were characterized by mostly PORT II (11 [10.5%] patients). All C/C genotype patients have PORT II (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Cytomegalovirus persistence worsens the pneumonia course. G/G and G/C TLR4 genotypes are associated with mild pneumonia severity.

Keywords: Community-acquired pneumonia, cytomegalovirus persistence, risk class, TLR4


How to cite this article:
Moroz LV, Chichirelo-Konstantynovych KD, Konstantynovych TV, Dudnyk VM. Prognostic influence of toll-like receptor 4 gene polymorphism into community-acquired pneumonia course among young patients with cytomegalovirus persistence. Lung India 2019;36:319-23

How to cite this URL:
Moroz LV, Chichirelo-Konstantynovych KD, Konstantynovych TV, Dudnyk VM. Prognostic influence of toll-like receptor 4 gene polymorphism into community-acquired pneumonia course among young patients with cytomegalovirus persistence. Lung India [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 22];36:319-23. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2019/36/4/319/261704




   Introduction Top


Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common infection associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with an annual incidence of 25 cases/10,000 adults and represents the eighth most common death cause in the USA.[1] The World Health Organization estimates that lower respiratory tract infection is the most common infectious cause of death in the world (the third most common cause overall), with almost 3.5 million deaths yearly.[2] Certainly, CAP rate is not decreased using new innovations in treatment and antibiotic generation. Such statistics among elderly population is explained as a result of chronic internal comorbidities influence into the fatal outcome of CAP.[3] The risk CAP factors among young population (18–44 years old according to the World Health Organization Classification) are controversial and are on the hypothesis stage. persistent asymptomatic diseases create an immunological basis for the attachment of the bacterial microflora and due to immunosuppression, worsen the course of CAP.[4] The most frequent cause of such persistent immunodeficiency can be asymptomatic cytomegalovirus infection (CMVI). Every third human of the planet gets persistent CMVI till the 30 years old.[5] Another great problem is late and incomplete investigation measures of CAP, especially its etiology. Several studies have shown that the yield of sputum Gram stain and culture in CAP is very low.[1] The incidence of positive blood culture in adult patients ranges 5%–27%, which leads to underestimation and the use of empirical therapy.[6] On the other hand, nonbacterial (viral and fungal) CAP etiology cannot be statistically recorded due to outpatient treating by different antibiotics.[7]

All these factors have different influence into CAP prognosis which depends on the genetic immunological response to the pathogen. The mutual burden of CMVI and CAP as comorbid states in the conditions of the existing immunodeficiency process due to its own cytopathic effect depends on the functional state of congenital immunity. A special group of innate immune receptors is the so-called “pattern recognition receptors,” which play a leading role in the recognition of pathogenic factors. They recognize “pathogen-associated molecular patterns” which are called toll-like receptors (TLRs).[8],[9] They contain a variable number of repetitive leucine-rich leukens that provide direct interaction of the receptor with the microorganisms' ligands or their products. The tertiary structure of this domain determines the specificity of TLR binding to certain PAMPs. This domain is involved in the transduction of the signal from the activated TLR inside the cell.[9]

The biological meaning of the activation of mechanisms of innate immunity by endogenous molecules is disturbed under the conditions of CAP with persistent CMVI, which results in an inadequate response of the immune system to signals of immune danger, and accordingly will disrupt antigenic homeostasis.[10] Hyperactivation of TLRs under the action of endogenous ligands can lead to the development of an excessive inflammatory response, accompanied by tissue damage. This can be considered as one of the main mechanisms of CAP-immunological pathogenesis. Pathological hyperreactivation of TLR is usually caused by genetic modifications in their allelic structure, which is genetically determined, manifested only with the active course of controlled pathology and is not subject to correction.[9],[10],[11] The effect of polymorphism of alleles such as TLR2, TLR3, and TLR9 on the course of CMVI in conditions of change in immunological reactivity is studied on an example of the characteristics of the course of myocardial infarction, stroke, and thrombosis of the veins of the lower extremities.[11] TLR4 polymorphisms are usually associated with pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae,[12] septicemia of candidal etiology,[11] and spondyloarthritis. Therefore, our main aim and objectives were to determine the frequency of alleles with mononucleotide substitution of the +3725 G/C of the TLR4 gene in young patients with CMVI to predict the course of the CAP.


   Subjects and Methods Top


One hundred and five CAP patients and 61 healthy individuals (age range: 18–44 years) were observed in this study. The CAP diagnosis was established clinically according to the Order No. 128 of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine (2007) and the Clinical Instruction (2013).[13] It took into account the results of the analysis of clinical and functional signs of lung injury, assessing the severity of the clinical symptoms of the disease in the points (cough and its character [productive and unproductive]) and severity in scores of the analog scale from 0 to 3, the nature of sputum, the level of shortness of breath in Medical Research Scale[14] scores (from 0 to 5), and objective symptoms (physical and laboratory). The CAP severity was measured by the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) in the scale of Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT). The PORT calculator added points due to the following criteria: gender, age, nursing home resident, neoplastic disease, liver disease history, congestive heart failure history, cerebrovascular disease history, renal disease history, altered mental status, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, temperature, pulse, pH, blood urea nitrogen, sodium level, glucose level, hematocrit, partial pressure of arterial O2, and pleural effusion. The result was evaluated as follows: 0–50 points – Risk Class I (light CAP course without hospitalization urgency); 51–70 points – Risk Class II (absence of complications and low mortality level [0.6%]; no hospitalization urgency); 71–90 points – Risk Class III (moderate CAP course and mortality level [2.8%]; outpatient and clinical treatment possibility); 91–130 points – Risk Class IV (severe CAP course; hospitalization urgency); and >130 points – Risk Class V (severe CAP course; hospitalization urgency due to high risk of severe complications).[15]

The CMVI-persistence status was evaluated by specific analysis for CMVI-antibodies immunoglobulin G (CMV IgG). For excluding false-positive CMV IgG, the CMVI-persistence duration was measured by CMV IgG-avidity rate: 1%–39% – low avidity, early CMVI; 40%–60% – avidity of middle degree, reconvalescent CMVI; and >60% – high avidity, anamnestic CMV antibodies.[16]

The TLR4 +3725 G/C polymorphism was extracted from DNA samples isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes of individuals. Electrophoretic fractionation of DNA fragments in agarose gel divided samples of the studied DNA according to the following genetic combinations: G/C heterozygotes, C/C homozygotes, and G/G homozygotes.[17]

Statistical data description was performed by SPSS 12.0 for Windows (Grand Pack, Serial Number 9593869, Deutschland).[18] Student's parametric test was used to compare two independent samples, and one-dimensional ANOVA dispersion analysis was used to compare >2 independent samples. Descriptive statistics was involved as well. The statistical probability of the investigator criterion was confirmed with an error value of P < 0.05.[18],[19]


   Results Top


Among examined CAP patients, there were 51 men (48.6%) and 54 women (51.4%) of average age 34.1 ± 0.8 years. The gender classification in the control group found 26 men (42.6%) and 35 women (57.4%) of average age 31.4 ± 0.9 years. The responders of compared groups were representative by gender and age (P = 0.53). In the main group, the PORT analysis demonstrated 19 (18.1%) CAP patients with Risk Class I, 46 (43.8%) patients with Risk Class II, 31 (29.5%) patients with Risk Class III, and 9 (8.6%) patients with Risk Class IV.

The specific immunological test for CMV IgG showed the positive result for CMVI persistence among 80 (48.2%) young CAP patients and 34 (20.5%) healthy respondents (χ2 = 8.685; r = −0.228; P = 0.003). In the main group, low avidity was established in 7 (6.7%) CAP patients, avidity of middle degree – 23 (21.9%) patients, and high avidity was found in 51 (48.6%) CAP patients. Avidity frequency distribution in control group detected such situation: 1 (1.6%) respondents with low avidity, 5 (8.2%) respondents with moderate avidity, and 28 (45.9%) respondents with high avidity (χ2 = 12.134; r = −0.116; P = 0.007). The prevalence of CMVI persistence in CAP patients influenced the CAP severity by increasing of PSI: 80 (76.2 %) CMV-positive CAP-patients (5 [4.8 %] – Risk class I; 38 [36.2 %] – Risk Class II; 28 [26.7 %] – Risk class III; 9 [8,6 %] Risk class IV) versus 25 (23.8 %) CMV-negative ones (χ2=33.323; r=0.472; P<0.0001).

During comparing the average values of the clinical CAP course, it was found that in the CAP patients with CMVI persistence, the average cough rate was 1.93 ± 0.08 points versus 1.42 ± 0.12 points (P = 0.001) in patients without positive markers of viral persistence. Correspondingly, the dynamics of the mean values of dyspnea (P = 0.004) and chest pain (P < 0.0001) were characterized. The average respiratory rate tended to increase among patients with CMV persistence and was 24.35 ± 0.57/min versus 22.25 ± 0.76/min among the CMV-negative respondents (P = 0.067). In addition, the presence of CMV persistence with a high degree of statistical probability increases the hospitalization period for the CAP patient. The average bed day for the CMV-positive respondent was 11.48 ± 0.27 days, whereas for the CMV-negative CAP patient was 9.13 ± 0.64 days (P < 0.0001). According to the status objectives among CAP patients with CMVI, the average values of the number of damaged lung segments (P = 0.002), the intensity of dull percussion sound (P < 0.0001), the severity of wet wheezing (P = 0.047) and crepitation (P = 0.020), and hyperthermia (P = 0.013) were higher compared to the similar indices in CMV-negative CAP patients.

The next step of our scientific work was to classify the respondents according to their TLR4 polymorphism variant and find the connection between CAP severity course genetic predispositions.

Frequency distribution of young CAP patients with TLR4 polymorphism with a monoclonal substitution of +3725 G/C revealed the highest prevalence in the G/G allele population (74.3%) [Figure 1]
Figure 1: Frequency distribution of young community-acquired pneumonia patients with toll-like receptor 4 polymorphism with a monoclonal substitution of +3725 G/C

Click here to view


Taking into account, the gender composition of the TLR4 polymorphisms surveyed in the group of CAP patients did not reveal any likely differences in the prevalence of a specific type of TLR4 genotype among a specific gender cohort (P > 0.05)

We investigated the distribution of respondents from the main group on the variants of the TLR4 of the +3725 G/C gene, taking into account the available CMV IgG to find the probable role of CMVI persistence in predicting the CAP course in patients with different combinations of TLR4 alleles [Figure 2].
Figure 2: The distribution of respondents from the main group on the variants of the toll-like receptor 4 of the +3725 G/C gene according to the cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin G appearance

Click here to view


The next step in the scientific search was the study of the distribution of respondents of CAP patients by variants of the +3725 G/C of the TLR4 gene and CMV IgG avidity. Among the CMV-positive patients, 62 respondents had G/G combination alleles, 2 patients had C/C, and G/C type allelic combination was found in 17 respondents. According to G/G variant of TLR4 polymorphism, 5 (4.8%) CAP patients had low avidity, 18 (1.1%) patients had moderate avidity, and 39 (37.1%) patients had high avidity. According to the G/C variant of TLR4 polymorphism, 1 (1.0%) CAP patient had low avidity, 4 (3.8%) patients had moderate avidity, and 12 (11.4%) CAP patients had high avidity. According to the C/C variant of TLR4 polymorphism, 1 (1.0%) CAP patient had low avidity and 1 (1.0%) more had moderate avidity. No CAP patient with C/C variant of TLR4 polymorphism had high CMV IgG avidity. Certainly, the obtained results were not statistically reliable (P = 0.40) and could have been significant in the study of a larger population of patients.

The PORT Scale mortality association study for CAP patients with TLR4 polymorphism showed statistically significant differences in the frequency distribution of respondents [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Frequency distribution of young community-acquired pneumonia patients with toll-like receptor 4 polymorphism +3725 G/C according to the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team scale of mortality prediction

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


According to our samples, females prevail in both comparison groups, which are suitable to the world gender statistics.[20] The majority (48.3%) of investigated CAP patients has Risk Class I and 8.6% CAP patients are characterized by the most severe CAP course and have Risk Class IV. Such distribution can be explained by young observation category and exclusion severe comorbid pathologies as additional factors for CAP course.

CMVI persistence index is reliably (P = 0.003) higher (more than two times) among CAP patients and calculates 48.2% versus 20.5% in control group. In this case, it is explained by widespread CMVI among the general population, and it is reflected in world statistics.[5] On the other hand, we pay attention for percentage differences between the comparison groups. The CMVI persistence predominance can testify for CMVI as a predictor of bacterial adjunctions in such patients. The modern medicine usually treats CMVI as a conclusion disease in immunocompromised individuals. Several studies can show us controversial opinion. CMVI is an independent source for immunological disorders and may have the bad influence into comorbid diseases of any etiology.[4] We also have used the distribution of respondents by CMV IgG avidity for avoiding false-positive results of CMVI persistence. The percentages levels have turned out to be reliably higher among CAP patients (P = 0.007). This feature speaks about long-term CMVI persistence in the main group. In addition, CMVI-positive status increases PSI among CAP patients (P < 0.0001), so worsens the CAP prognosis. It confirms the hypothesis of multifunctional mechanisms of CMVI influence into the immunological status of patients and the launch of prognostic adverse effects in CAP course.[21],[22] The differences of clinical manifestations between CMVI-positive and CMVI-negative CAP patients fully confirm this hypothesis. clinical signs of CAP (cough and sputum) and objective data (percussion and auscultation phenomena) are much more extensive in individuals with CMVI-positive markers, which are statistically proven (P < 0.05).

The distribution of CAP young population according to TLR4 +3725 G/C polymorphism shows the statistically reliable domination of homozygote G/G variant, which is observed in 74.3% respondents (P < 0.05). As we look for new connections between CMVI and TLR4 signaling, the results of our study show that CMVI-positive patients with G/G polymorphism variant (P < 0.01) and G/C polymorphism variant (P < 0.05) have higher CAP catching risk than CMVI-negative patients. The same tendency among patients with C/C polymorphism variant is not statistically confirmed. Such connection can be valid only in the condition of exclusion of other comorbid pathologies. Frequency distribution of young CAP patients with TLR4 polymorphism +3725 G/C according to the PORT scale of mortality prediction shows that CAP patients with G/C and G/G genotypes are mostly characterized by mild CAP course (Risk Class II). The role of C/C genotype in CAP severity can be recognized by studying on a larger population. In our opinion, the C-allele appearance in TLR4 +3725G/C polymorphism worsens CAP-course prediction by PSI score elevation at young patients.


   Conclusions Top


Despite the large number of studies about CAP, it remains an urgent problem due to the high degree of complications and mortality. Young population is in a high risk group according to specificity of immunological mechanisms and genetic predisposition. The main conclusions of our investigation on this connection are next:

  1. Young CAP-patients without comorbid immunological pathology are characterized by significantly high level of CMVI persistence (48.2 %) which may lead to severe complications of CAP-course.
  2. The severity of CAP-course directly depends on CMVI-persistence duration.
  3. The gomozygote G/G variant of TLR4 +3725 G/C polymorphism predominates among 74.3 % patients.
  4. The mild CAP course is observed among G/G and G/C TLR4 signaling types. The influence of C/C genotype into CAP course needs further research.


Acknowledgment

The author's team would like to express the sincere gratitude to the Ukrainian Laboratory and Diagnostic Center (Kyiv) for technical help in complete laboratory investigations.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Downing M, Johnstone J. Community-acquired pneumonia. Evid Based Infect Dis 2018;50:73-80.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. The Top 10 Causes of Death. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/index.html. [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 09].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mostovoy YM, Demchuk AV, Konstantynovych TV, Chichirelo-Konstantynovych KD. Chronic comorbidity of internal organs as a risk factor of complications and fatal outcome of community-acquired pneumonia. Med Perspect 2018;23:112-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Moroz LV, Chichirello-Konstantinovich KD, Konstantinovich TV, Bondarchuk OB. Characteristic parameters of immunological status of patients community-acqured pneumonia: the specific features of cytomegalovirus infection persistence. Rep Vinnytsia Natl Med Univ 2017;19:423-8. Available from: https://www.reports-vnmedical.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/257. [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 09].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Moroz LV, Chicherielyo-Konstantinovich KD, Konstantinovich TV. Prevalence and characteristics of persisent cytomegalovirus infection with community-acqured pneumonia. Rep Morphol 2017;21:404-7. Available from: https://www.morphology-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/180. [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 09].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wunderink RG, Waterer GW. Clinical practice. Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2014;370:543-51.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lodise T, Classi P, Blumberg P, Murty S, Tillotson G. Medical and pharmacy costs associated with the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia in the outpatient setting. In: C37 New Insights in the Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes of Cystic Fibrosis, Ild, and Respiratory Disease. American Thoracic Society; 2017. p. A5355.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Wang X, Guo J, Wang Y, Xiao Y, Wang L, Hua S. Expression levels of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) and related inflammatory cytokines associated with severity, prognosis, and causative pathogen in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Med Sci Monit 2018;24:3620-30.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Anderson R, Feldman C. Review manuscript: Mechanisms of platelet activation by the pneumococcus and the role of platelets in community-acquired pneumonia. J Infect 2017;75:473-85.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Piñana JL, Gómez MD, Pérez A, Madrid S, Balaguer-Roselló A, Giménez E, et al. Community-acquired respiratory virus lower respiratory tract disease in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipient: Risk factors and mortality from pulmonary virus-bacterial mixed infections. Transpl Infect Dis 2018;20:e12926.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lorenz E, Mira JP, Frees KL, Schwartz DA. Relevance of mutations in the TLR4 receptor in patients with gram-negative septic shock. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1028-32.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Verhein KC, Vellers HL, Kleeberger SR. Inter-individual variation in health and disease associated with pulmonary infectious agents. Mamm Genome 2018;29:38-47.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Feshchenko YI, Holubovska OA, Goncharov KA. Community-Acquired and Nosocomial Pneumonia in Adults: Etiology, Pathogenesis, Classification, Diagnostics, Antibiotic Therapy. Metodychnii Posibnyk; 2014. p. 122.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bestall JC, Paul EA, Garrod R, Garnham R, Jones PW, Wedzicha JA. Usefulness of the medical research council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1999;54:581-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Jones B. Capsule commentary on sanz et al. A composite of functional status and pneumonia severity index improves the prediction of pneumonia mortality in older patients. J Gen Intern Med 2018;33:493.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tanimura K, Tairaku S, Morioka I, Ozaki K, Nagamata S, Morizane M, et al. Universal screening with use of immunoglobulin G avidity for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:1652-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Suzuki K, Kobayashi A, Kaneko S, Takehira K, Yoshihara T, Ishida H, et al. Reevaluation of absolute luminescence quantum yields of standard solutions using a spectrometer with an integrating sphere and a back-thinned CCD detector. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2009;11:9850-60.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hull CH, Nie NH. SPSS Up date 7-9 New Procedures and Facilities for Releases 7-9. McGraw-Hill Press; 1981;402:312-89.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bhatt A. Global Gender Parity Insights from the World Economic Forum's Gender Gap Report. Chicago Policy Review; 29 March, 2017.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Gorikov IN, Kolosov VP, Nakhamchen LG, Ishutina NA, Andrievskaya IA. The state of immune protection during exacerbation of chronic simple bronchitis, caused by the reactivation of chronic cytomegalovirus Infection in women in the second trimester of pregnancy. In: D56 What's New in Lung Infection: Bacterial, Viral, and Fungal. American Thoracic Society; 2018. p. a7244.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Chichirelo-Konstantynovych K, Moroz L, Konstantynovych T. The predictive role of TLR4 +3725G/C polymorphism in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) severity course among young respondents with cytomegaloviral persistence (CMVP). European Respiratory Journal 2018;52; PA 4226; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.  Back to cited text no. 22
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed101    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded17    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal