Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 691   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
  Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 330-336  

Influenza H1N1 infection in immunocompromised host: A concise review


Department of Critical Care Medicine, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication28-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. M M Harish
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Narayana Hrudayalaya, 258/A, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Hosur Road, Anekal, Bengaluru - 560 099, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_464_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Influenza A (H1N1) infection has a propensity to infect an immunocompromised host (ICH). These patients experience more severe manifestations and related complications with increased mortality. Influenza A (H1N1) infection in ICH differs from non-ICH in terms of clinical features, range of complications, radiological features, treatment response, and outcome. Radiology may show higher number of lesions but with no or minimal corresponding clinical manifestations. Coinfection with streptococci, staphylococci, and Aspergillus further increases mortality. Antiviral resistance compounds the overall picture despite optimal regimen. Use of steroids is detrimental. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is usually avoided in ICH. However, ICH groups with influenza A (H1N1) infection complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome who have received ECMO have recorded mortality up to 61%. Nevertheless, evidence-based recommendation on use of ECMO in ICH is lacking. Annual inactivated influenza vaccine is recommended for most ICH groups with a few exceptions and for their close contacts. Hygiene measures greatly contribute to reducing disease burden. High index of suspicion for influenza A (H1N1) infection in ICH, early antiviral therapy, and treatment of coinfection is recommended. With the threat of transmission of resistant viral strains from ICH to the community, apart from treatment, preventive measures such as vaccination and hygienic practices have a significant role. Through this review, we have attempted to identify clinical and radiological peculiarities in ICH with influenza A (H1N1) infection, treatment guidelines, and prognostic factors. Influenza A (H1N1) infection in ICH may remain clinically silent or mild.

Keywords: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in immunocompromised, influenza-associated aspergillosis, influenza vaccine in immunocompromised, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in H1N1


How to cite this article:
Harish M M, Ruhatiya RS. Influenza H1N1 infection in immunocompromised host: A concise review. Lung India 2019;36:330-6

How to cite this URL:
Harish M M, Ruhatiya RS. Influenza H1N1 infection in immunocompromised host: A concise review. Lung India [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 21];36:330-6. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2019/36/4/330/261712




   Introduction Top


In March 2009, an outbreak of the pandemic influenza A (A/H1N1pdm09) viral infection was detected in Mexico. Soon after, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a pandemic on June 11, 2009. It indicated widespread community transmission on at least two continents.[1] India reported its first pH1N1 influenza-positive case from Pune city on June 22, 2009, in a traveler from the USA. The first death in India due to pH1N1 influenza was on August 3, 2009.

Treating influenza A (H1N1) in immunocompromised host (ICH) poses peculiar challenges which will be discussed in this review. Here, ICH implies human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, patients with active malignancies, particularly hematological malignancies, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy recipients, hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, patients on high-dose corticosteroid therapy (>2 weeks),[2] pregnant women, and pediatric population.


   Virology of Influenza Virus Top


Influenza viruses are RNA viruses of the Orthomyxoviridae family classified as influenza A, B, and C. Influenza A viruses are further subdivided as per the antigenic characteristics of their surface hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N) glycoproteins. Influenza A has 15 H and 9 N subtypes, of which only H1, H2, H3, N1, and N2 have caused extensive outbreaks in humans.[3]

The pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus (influenza A [H1N1] pdm09 virus) strain is a product of genetic reassortment, called asantigenic shift, resulting in a novel strain with new antigens. It represents a quadruple reassortment of two swine strains, one human strain, and one avian strain of influenza.[4]


   Epidemiology of Influenza a (H1N1) in Immunocompromised Host Top


As compared to seasonal influenza, peak occurrence of H1N1 pneumonia is not related to extremes of age. Patients >65 years of age possibly possess preexisting immunity against antigenically similar influenza viruses that circulated prior to 1957.[5] Hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) titers >1:40 is considered to represent good antibody response.[6] One study showed lower levels of cross-reactive antibodies to the influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 virus among individuals <70 years age compared to those ≥90 years age (6% vs. 88%, respectively, had HI titers >1:40).[7]

We focused on literature from 2009 onward with most of it dedicated to pH1N1 influenza. For epidemiology, we reviewed nine indexed publications[2],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15] [Figure 1] on influenza A (H1N1) in ICH subgroups except pregnancy. Overall, male preponderance and higher frequency in adults was noted. In addition, other studies suggested that pregnant women, especially in the third trimester[16],[17] and obese patients[18] were more prone to influenza A (H1N1). Data on vaccination status was insufficient. Four continents (North America, South America, Europe, and Oceania) were represented in the studies above. Unfortunately, no robust data representing the developing countries were available.
Figure 1: Studies included in the review for epidemiology

Click here to view



   Clinical Features of Influenza a (H1N1) in Immunocompromised Host Top


Memoli et al. have found fewer overall influenza symptoms in ICH. They postulate that although the cytokine response to acute infection in ICH is similar to non-ICH, ICH shows a blunted illness with minimal or no clinical manifestations.[8]


   Peculiar Issues of Influenza a (H1N1) in Immunocompromised Host Top


ICH, particularly with pH1N1 influenza are more prone to severe influenza-associated complications, prolonged viral shedding, bacterial or fungal coinfections, and emergence of antiviral drug resistance.[19] ICH tend to have more severe disease with higher morbidity and mortality.[20],[21],[22]

The most common complication is pneumonia. Neurologic complications in decreasing order of frequency include seizures including status epilepticus, encephalopathy or encephalitis, meningitis, and Guillain–Barre syndrome.[23] Systemic complications include bronchiolitis, status asthmaticus, myocarditis, pericarditis, rhabdomyolysis, renal insufficiency, toxic shock syndrome, and multiorgan failure.[24]

Prolonged viral shedding in ICH with influenza A (H1N1) despite antiviral therapy results in longer hospitalization albeit with a shorter ICU stay, in ICH and an eventual poorer outcome.[8]

Immunocompromised patients are more prone to co-infections by bacterial and fungal pathogens. Increased susceptibility to coinfection in ICH with influenza A (H1N1) by bacteria or fungi can be explained thus. Pulmonary epithelial cell injury caused by the replicating influenza virus exposes potential attachment sites for bacterial or fungal invasion and impairs the clearance of secretion from the respiratory tract. Alternatively, phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages and chemotaxis of polymorphonuclear leukocytes may be inhibited after influenza infection.[25]

In cases of pH1N1 influenza with bacterial coinfection, the pathogens in respiratory secretions identified in decreasing order of frequency are Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas species, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and other bacteria. Among S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) constitute 48%.[26] Smaller studies with conflicting results will not be discussed. Typical picture of MRSA coinfection after pH1N1 influenza is of a previously healthy young adult presenting with severe pneumonia with hemoptysis, hypotension followed by rapid progression to septic shock, and respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support. MRSA-induced necrotizing pneumonia is associated with high fatality rate.[26],[27]

Vanderbeke et al.[28] in their compact review on influenza-associated aspergillosis (IAA) found that majority of their patients were immunocompromised. Morbidity and mortality was high with 57% deaths. Garnacho-Montero et al.[2] reported 100% mortality in cases of ICH with influenza A (H1N1) and IAA. Underlying pathogenesis is similar to bacterial coinfection.[28] Clinical presentation of IAA is worsening of respiratory symptoms after initial improvement. Complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), secondary bacterial infections, oseltamivir-resistance, or pulmonary hemorrhage can lead to stormy clinical course in ICH.[29]


   Diagnosis of Influenza a (H1N1) Top


Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), especially with combined nasopharyngeal and throat swabs with nasopharyngeal aspirates is the most sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of influenza A (H1N1). Viral culture has similar sensitivity but is too slow to help guide clinical management. A negative viral culture does not exclude influenza A (H1N1). Rapid antigen test and immunofluorescent antibody (direct or indirect) tests can distinguish between influenza A and B viruses. However, they cannot subtype the pandemic and seasonal strains. This can only be done by rRT-PCR or culture.[30],[31] Serologic testing for HI titer is most useful for influenza surveillance.[32]


   Diagnostic Challenges of Influenza a (H1N1) in Immunocompromised Host Top


Rapid diagnosis of influenza in ICH is vital because delay in antiviral initiation is associated with poorer outcome.[12],[16],[17],[33] A few studies have underscored the effect of influenza on morbidity and mortality in ICH. In HSCT recipients, influenza causes higher incidence of pneumonia[34] and mortality up to 43%.[35] In renal transplant recipients with pH1N1 influenza, there is increased allograft dysfunction. In SOT recipients, there is higher incidence of myocarditis[36] and pneumonitis[37] and mortality up to 7%.[12] In HIV-infected cases, higher incidence of pneumonia and mortality occurs.[38] In hematological malignancies and chemotherapy (for solid tumors) recipients, we see increased pneumonia.[39]

Garcia-Vidal C et al.[29] concluded that reverse transcriptase PCR is superior to direct fluorescence assay for detection of influenza virus in ICH. Furthermore, direct fluorescence assay shows low yield in viral detection in samples collected in the early days of symptom onset. Lower respiratory tract sample has a higher diagnostic yield. Notwithstanding, positivity in a lower respiratory tract sample portends worse outcome.[40]


   Radiology in Immunocompromised Host Top


Higher number of radiographic abnormalities is noted in ICH, suggestive of increased risk of pulmonary involvement and complications. Ironically, clinical manifestations are minimal.[8] Extensive pulmonary infiltrates (median Murray score 3) have been reported.[15] In 14 critically ill patients with probable or confirmed pH1N1 influenza, extensive disease involving ≥3 lung zones was observed in 13. Nodular opacities and pulmonary emboli were reported on computed tomography (CT) chest imaging.[41] However, prognostic implications of radiological abnormalities are not well studied.


   Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Immunocompromised Host Top


Diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in ICH is difficult. While histological identification of acute-angle branching septated hyphae is ideal to prove IPA, lung biopsy in critically ill or ICH is not feasible. Characteristic CT finding of “halo-sign” of IPA might be absent in IPA.[28] Bronchoscopy provides the solution. It allows collection of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) and visualization of the trachea and bronchi. Galactomannan antigen detection and culture on BAL has good sensitivity in IAA, (94% and 78%, respectively).[42] Any positive serum Galactomannan antigen in severe influenza mandates immediate antifungal treatment.[28] Recently introduced lateral flow device tests for detection of Aspergillus antigens in serum and BAL generate the results within 30 min.[43] Plaques in the trachea or bronchi noted during bronchoscopy in 15% may represent aspergillus tracheobronchitis. Bronchoscopy has been recommended by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) in suspected IPA.[44]


   Antiviral Agents Top


Neuraminidase inhibitors (zanamivir, oseltamivir, peramivir, and laninamivir), adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine),[45] and endonuclease inhibitors[46] (recently approved baloxavir) are the three classes of antiviral drugs available for the treatment and prevention of influenza. There is generally cross-resistance between oseltamivir and peramivir, attributed to the similarity in their chemical structure. Histidine to tyrosine substitution at amino acid 275 (H275Y) mutation is the most common mutation at the conserved active site of the neuraminidase. It confers high levels of resistance to both these drugs. Resistance to zanamivir has been minimal to date, with no major report of cross-resistance due to H275Y mutation. E119D/G mutations have been associated with resistance to multiple neuraminidase inhibitors in pandemic H1N1 isolates.[47] Single-point mutations (most common at position 31) in the codons for amino acids of M2 protein affect the transmembrane portion of this protein and confer cross-resistance to both amantadine and rimantadine.[48]


   Therapeutic Challenges in Immunocompromised Host Top


Patient-related issues are lack of typical clinical presentation, coinfection, poor response to vaccination, prolonged influenza shedding, and potential for spreading resistant strains in the community. Pathogen-related issues are that the virus shows constant intrahost evolution, antigenic drift within the same ICH, development of antiviral resistance after therapy,[8],[49] and simultaneous coinfection with two influenza subtypes.[50] The net outcome is diagnostic delay, treatment delay, and increased morbidity and mortality.

For severe ICH (like those receiving chemotherapy for malignancies, hematopoietic, or SOT recipients) who present with an acute respiratory illness, prompt antiviral therapy initiation has been recommended.[51] Benefit of such intervention is seen thus. SOT recipients pH1N1 influenza who received antiviral therapy within 48 h of symptom onset showed lower ICU admission compared with those receiving antiviral therapy later (8% vs. 22%).[12] In a retrospective study of HSCT recipients with influenza, early antiviral therapy for upper respiratory tract disease within 48 h of diagnosis predicted reduced risk of progressing to lower respiratory tract disease, hypoxemia, and overall death.[52] Among pregnant women with pH1N1 influenza, delay of antiviral therapy initiation >4 days after symptom onset was associated with increased admission to ICU than those who began therapy within 2 days (57% vs. 9%).[16] Similar delay in severely ill pregnant women with pH1N1 influenza increased the mortality in another study.[17] Overall, critically ill patients of any etiology benefited from early antiviral initiation for suspected or confirmed influenza.[33] Antiviral treatment may be required for >5 days.[53]

Limited data are avaialable on the response of influenza infection to combination antiviral therapies in ICH. Six patients in a pilot study received triple combination therapy with amantadine, oseltamivir, and ribavirin. Clinical response was favorable, and pharmacokinetics were safe. However, the sample size was too small to generalize these findings or make recommendations.[54] Barring this study, we found no major study supporting combination therapy in influenza.

Due to widespread resistance, adamantanes are no longer recommended[53] and warrant no further mention. Oseltamivir resistance due to H275Y mutation has already been discussed. In such cases, the possibility of cross-resistance to peramivir renders it ineffective.[55] Intravenous zanamivir was earlier approved for oseltamivir-resistant cases.[56] However, it is currently available only as inhaled preparation. Its use in patients with severe respiratory illness and chronic respiratory conditions such as asthma, obstructive airway disease is not recommended.[45] Intravenous peramivir was approved in 2014 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating uncomplicated influenza infection in adults who have been ill for ≤48 h.[57] Laninamivir was approved for use in Japan in 2010 and is in Phase III clinical trial of the WHO.[58] Baloxavir was approved in October 2018 by the FDA for the treatment of acute uncomplicated influenza in adults and children ≥12 years of age who have been symptomatic for ≤48 h.[46]

Several adjunctive approaches have been evaluated including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), N-acetyl cysteine, intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG), and glucocorticoids. [Table 1] outlines treatment options in influenza A (H1N1). Recent reviews found no benefit from steroid use in severe influenza.[59],[64] In ICH steroids, possibly increase co-infection by downregulating innate and adaptive immunity (like in IAA).[28] Sporadic reports show its beneficial use in organizing pneumonia,[65] postviral inflammatory pneumonitis,[66] and influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia in a pregnant woman.[67]
Table 1: Treatment options in influenza

Click here to view


Conventional positive pressure ventilation leads to exacerbation of lung injury due to barotrauma, volutrauma, biotrauma, and toxicity from high oxygen concentrations. These issues can be mitigated by ECMO. However, the exact mechanism and usefulness of ECMO in severe ARDS in ICH are not clear. The conventional ventilation or ECMO for severe adult respiratory failure trial clearly demonstrated survival benefit at 6 months using ECMO.[68] Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry report showed overall survival rates of up to 67% in 2009.[69] Subsequent benefit of ECMO was noted, especially in viral pneumonias.[68],[70],[71] However, ECMO in ICH was one of the poor prognostic factors.[72],[73] As per the ELSO guidelines, presence of leukopenia (neutrophils <500 mm3) or other immunocompromising conditions may be a contraindication for ECMO, but this is not clearly defined.[69] Despite this, Pham et al. performed ECMO in an ICH group. Markedly lower mortality rates were seen in younger patients managed with ECMO despite severe respiratory failure.[74] In a review of ECMO for managing ARDS in ICH, an overall mortality rate of 61.1% was seen.[61] Interpretation and extrapolation of this result is debatable.


   Drug Resistance in Immunocompromised Host Top


Resistance mutations to oseltamivir and/or zanamivir emerge more commonly in ICH probably due to prolonged viral shedding despite antiviral therapy.[49],[75],[76] It poses a new threat of development and community spread of resistance. One study found all influenza viruses identified in ICH group to be resistant to at least one class of antiviral agents. Four percent of the viruses were resistant to neuraminidase inhibitors as well as adamantanes. ICH group that received a prolonged course of antiviral therapy (>5 days) showed greater tendency to harbor resistant viruses.[8]


   Prognostic Factors for Influenza a (H1N1) in Immunocompromised Host Top


Factors independently associated with mortality in ICH with influenza A (H1N1) are male sex, high Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, use of corticosteroids, and vasopressor support.[2] Delayed antiviral therapy beyond 48 h of symptom onset also correlates with poor prognosis.[52] Thus, the initiation of antiviral treatment at the earliest suspicion of influenza in ICH is advisable.


   Prevention Strategies Used in Immunocompromised Host Top


An 8-year long study has demonstrated beyond doubt the positive effects of vaccination in health-care workers (HCWs) on reduction in nosocomial influenza in cancer patients. Policy changes have included signage throughout the institution to remind patients, family members and caregivers to cover their cough during the influenza season, and frequent hand hygiene and refrain from touching their mucous membranes (eyes, nose, and mouth) while in hospital. Screening of visitors for upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and restrictions on visiting high-risk patients have proven effective. HCWs with URTI are encouraged to use mask. HCWs with fever >38°C and uncontrollable secretions, cough, or other communicable respiratory symptoms are excluded from direct patient care until 24 h after resolution of fever in the absence of antipyretics.[77] ICH with influenza A (H1N1) should ideally be housed in a room with positive airflow. Restricted access minimizes nosocomial spread of the virus.[29] At the community level, a combination of hand hygiene and face masks, implemented within 36 h of symptom onset in the index patient, has prevented household transmission of seasonal influenza.[78]


   Chemoprophylaxis in Immunocompromised Host Top


For an ICH at high risk of complications from influenza or their unvaccinated close contacts, chemoprophylaxis is advisable if close contacts are diagnosed with influenza. Oseltamivir within 48 h of exposure and continued for 10 days is recommended. This recommendation is independent of the previous vaccination status of the ICH.[60]


   Vaccination in Immunocompromised Host Top


Due to the constantly evolving influenza virus, restructured vaccines against prevalent strains have to be developed and deployed periodically. We restrict ourselves to reviewing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for influenza vaccine for 2018–2019 in ICH[79] and IDSA guidelines of 2013 for vaccination in ICH.[80] The latter have remained unchanged and have been used by CDC for 2018–2019. CDC advises against the use of live attenuated influenza vaccine in ICH and their close contacts including family members and HCWs. ICH have higher risk for disease attributable to the vaccine virus and blunted immune response to such vaccines. CDC recommends annual use of inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) or quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4) in an ICH and their close contacts.[79]

The IDSA recommends annual vaccination with IIV in ICH aged ≥6 months. This group includes HIV-infected patients, those with solid organ malignancy, hematological malignancy, and patients on chronic immunosuppressive therapy. For HSCT recipients, IIV is recommended for persons aged ≥6 months starting 6 months after HSCT. In SOT recipients, IIV is best provided between 2 and 6 months after transplant. Exceptions to receiving IIV in ICH are patients who are very unlikely to respond (although unlikely to be harmed by IIV), such as those receiving intensive chemotherapy such as for induction or consolidation chemotherapy in acute leukemia or those who have received anti-B-cell antibodies within 6 months.[79]


   Future Directions Top


Guidelines on the range of use of newer antivirals such as peramivir, laninamivir, and baloxavir are eagerly awaited. Efficacy of combination therapies in ICH will be soon clear. Prospective studies for the use of steroid in severe influenza, and especially ICH are urgently required given the widespread misconceptions and variations in treatment policies regarding its use. Role of ECMO and other novel therapies such as IVIG and N-acetyl cysteine if proven effective might open uncharted territories.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
World Health Organization. World now at the Start of 2009 Influenza Pandemic. Statement to the Press by WHO Director-General Dr. Margaret Chan. World Health Organization; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Garnacho-Montero J, León-Moya C, Gutiérrez-Pizarraya A, Arenzana-Seisdedos A, Vidaur L, Guerrero JE, et al. Clinical characteristics, evolution, and treatment-related risk factors for mortality among immunosuppressed patients with influenza A (H1N1) virus admitted to the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2018;48:172-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Neumann G, Noda T, Kawaoka Y. Emergence and pandemic potential of swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus. Nature 2009;459:931-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA, Shu B, Lindstrom S, Balish A, et al. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science 2009;325:197-201.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hancock K, Veguilla V, Lu X, Zhong W, Butler EN, Sun H, et al. Cross-reactive antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1945-52.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Greenberg ME, Lai MH, Hartel GF, Wichems CH, Gittleson C, Bennet J, et al. Response to a monovalent 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccine. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2405-13.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Skowronski DM, Hottes TS, McElhaney JE, Janjua NZ, Sabaiduc S, Chan T, et al. Immuno-epidemiologic correlates of pandemic H1N1 surveillance observations: Higher antibody and lower cell-mediated immune responses with advanced age. J Infect Dis 2011;203:158-67.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Memoli MJ, Athota R, Reed S, Czajkowski L, Bristol T, Proudfoot K, et al. The natural history of influenza infection in the severely immunocompromised vs. nonimmunocompromised hosts. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:214-24.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Peters PJ, Skarbinski J, Louie JK, Jain S; New York City Department of Health Swine Flu Investigation Team, Roland M. HIV-infected hospitalized patients with 2009 pandemic influenza A (pH1N1)– United States, Spring and Summer 2009. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52 Suppl 1:S183-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Perez CM, Dominguez MI, Ceballos ME, Moreno C, Labarca JA, Rabagliati R, et al. Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS 2010;24:2867-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Riera M, Payeras A, Marcos MA, Viasus D, Farinas MC, Segura F, et al. Clinical presentation and prognosis of the 2009 H1N1 influenza A infection in HIV-1-infected patients: A Spanish multicenter study. AIDS 2010;24:2461-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kumar D, Michaels MG, Morris MI, Green M, Avery RK, Liu C, et al. Outcomes from pandemic influenza A H1N1 infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants: A multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2010;10:521-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Smud A, Nagel CB, Madsen E, Rial Mdel C, Barcán LA, Gomez AA, et al. Pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: A multicenter study. Transplantation 2010;90:1458-62.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Espinosa-Aguilar L, Green JS, Forrest GN, Ball ED, Maziarz RT, Strasfeld L, et al. Novel H1N1 influenza in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: Two centers' experiences. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011;17:566-73.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Camous L, Lemiale V, Canet E, Max A, Schnell D, Le Goff J, et al. Clinical features of H1N1 2009 infection in critically ill immunocompromised patients. Crit Care 2010;14:139.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, Fry AM, Seib K, Callaghan WM, et al. Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States. JAMA 2010;303:1517-25.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Maternal and infant outcomes among severely ill pregnant and postpartum women with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)–United States, April 2009-August 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:1193-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Louie JK, Acosta M, Samuel MC, Schechter R, Vugia DJ, Harriman K, et al. Anovel risk factor for a novel virus: Obesity and 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1). Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:301-12.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Oseltamivir-resistant novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in two immunosuppressed patients – Seattle, Washington, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:893-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kumar A, Zarychanski R, Pinto R, Cook DJ, Marshall J, Lacroix J, et al. Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada. JAMA 2009;302:1872-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Louie JK, Acosta M, Winter K, Jean C, Gavali S, Schechter R, et al. Factors associated with death or hospitalization due to pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in California. JAMA 2009;302:1896-902.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
ANZIC Influenza Investigators, Webb SA, Pettilä V, Seppelt I, Bellomo R, Bailey M, et al. Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1925-34.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Glaser CA, Winter K, DuBray K, Harriman K, Uyeki TM, Sejvar J, et al. Apopulation-based study of neurologic manifestations of severe influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 in California. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:514-20.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Lee N, Chan PK, Lui GC, Wong BC, Sin WW, Choi KW, et al. Complications and outcomes of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in hospitalized adults: How do they differ from those in seasonal influenza? J Infect Dis 2011;203:1739-47.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Abramson JS, Parce JW, Lewis JC, Lyles DS, Mills EL, Nelson RD, et al. Characterization of the effect of influenza virus on polymorphonuclear leukocyte membrane responses. Blood 1984;64:131-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Randolph AG, Vaughn F, Sullivan R, Rubinson L, Thompson BT, Yoon G, et al. Critically ill children during the 2009-2010 influenza pandemic in the United States. Pediatrics 2011;128:e1450-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Hidron AI, Low CE, Honig EG, Blumberg HM. Emergence of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300 as a cause of necrotising community-onset pneumonia. Lancet Infect Dis 2009;9:384-92.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Vanderbeke L, Spriet I, Breynaert C, Rijnders BJ, Verweij PE, Wauters J. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis complicating severe influenza: Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2018;31:471-80.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Garcia-Vidal C, Barba P, Arnan M, Moreno A, Ruiz-Camps I, Gudiol C, et al. Invasive aspergillosis complicating pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection in severely immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:e16-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Recommendations for Clinical Use of Influenza Diagnostic Tests during the 2009-10 Influenza Season. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/guidance/diagnostic_tests.htm. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 14].  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Guidance for the Detection of Novel Influenza A Virus using Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/guidance/rapid_testing.htm. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 14].  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Iwasenko JM, Cretikos M, Paterson DL, Gibb R, Webb SA, Smith DW, et al. Enhanced diagnosis of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza infection using molecular and serological testing in intensive care unit patients with suspected influenza. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51:70-2.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Rodríguez A, Díaz E, Martín-Loeches I, Sandiumenge A, Canadell L, Díaz JJ, et al. Impact of early oseltamivir treatment on outcome in critically ill patients with 2009 pandemic influenza A. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:1140-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Nichols WG, Guthrie KA, Corey L, Boeckh M. Influenza infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Risk factors, mortality, and the effect of antiviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:1300-6.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Weigt SS, Gregson AL, Deng JC, Lynch JP 3rd, Belperio JA. Respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2011;32:471-93.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Vilchez RA, Fung JJ, Kusne S. Influenza A myocarditis developing in an adult liver transplant recipient despite vaccination: A case report and review of the literature. Transplantation 2000;70:543-5.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Embrey RP, Geist LJ. Influenza A pneumonitis following treatment of acute cardiac allograft rejection with murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3). Chest 1995;108:1456-9.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Lin JC, Nichol KL. Excess mortality due to pneumonia or influenza during influenza seasons among persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:441-6.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Casper C, Englund J, Boeckh M. How I treat influenza in patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood 2010;115:1331-42.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Reddy KP, Bajwa EK, Parker RA, Onderdonk AB, Walensky RP. Relationship between upper respiratory tract influenza test result and clinical outcomes among critically ill influenza patients. Open Forum Infect Dis 2016;3:ofw023.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Agarwal PP, Cinti S, Kazerooni EA. Chest radiographic and CT findings in novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus (S-OIV) infection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1488-93.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Schauwvlieghe AF, Rijnders BJ, Philips N, Verwijs R, Vanderbeke L, Van Tienen C, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe influenza: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2018;6:782-92.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Eigl S, Prattes J, Lackner M, Willinger B, Spiess B, Reinwald M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a lateral-flow device test for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in ICU patients. Crit Care 2015;19:178.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Patterson TF, Thompson GR 3rd, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:e1-60.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza Antiviral Medications Summary for Clinicians. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/antivirals/summary-clinicians.htm. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 11].  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
US Food and Drug Administration. FDA News Release: FDA Approves New Drug to Treat Influenza. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm624226.htm. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 11].  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
L'Huillier AG, Abed Y, Petty TJ, Cordey S, Thomas Y, Bouhy X, et al. E119D neuraminidase mutation conferring pan-resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors in an A (H1N1) pdm09 isolate from a stem-cell transplant recipient. J Infect Dis 2015;212:1726-34.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health Alert. CDC recommends against the use of amantadine and rimantadine for the treatment or prophylaxis of influenza in the United States during the 2005–06 influenza season. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/han011406.htm. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 11].  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Memoli MJ, Hrabal RJ, Hassantoufighi A, Jagger BW, Sheng ZM, Eichelberger MC, et al. Rapid selection of a transmissible multidrug-resistant influenza A/H3N2 virus in an immunocompromised host. J Infect Dis 2010;201:1397-403.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Nishikawa F, Sugiyama T. Direct isolation of H1N2 recombinant virus from a throat swab of a patient simultaneously infected with H1N1 and H3N2 influenza A viruses. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:425-7.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated Interim Recommendations for the use of Antiviral Medications in the Treatment and Prevention of Influenza for the 2009-2010 Season. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/recommendations.htm. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 11].  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Choi SM, Boudreault AA, Xie H, Englund JA, Corey L, Boeckh M, et al. Differences in clinical outcomes after 2009 influenza A/H1N1 and seasonal influenza among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Blood 2011;117:5050-6.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Fiore AE, Fry A, Shay D, Gubareva L, Bresee JS, Uyeki TM. Antiviral agents for the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza-recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2011;60:1-24.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Seo S, Englund JA, Nguyen JT, Pukrittayakamee S, Lindegardh N, Tarning J, et al. Combination therapy with amantadine, oseltamivir and ribavirin for influenza A infection: Safety and pharmacokinetics. Antivir Ther 2013;18:377-86.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Wester A, Shetty AK. Peramivir injection in the treatment of acute influenza: A review of the literature. Infect Drug Resist 2016;9:201-14. Doi:10.2147/IDR.S86460.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Alame MM, Massaad E, Zaraket H. Peramivir: A Novel Intravenous Neuraminidase Inhibitor for Treatment of Acute Influenza Infections. Front Microbiol 2016;7:450. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00450.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
McLaughlin MM, Skoglund EW, Ison MG. Peramivir: An intravenous neuraminidase inhibitor. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015;16:1889-900.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Hayden F. Developing new antiviral agents for influenza treatment: What does the future hold? Clin Infect Dis 2009;48 Suppl 1:S3-13.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Nedel WL, Nora DG, Salluh JI, Lisboa T, Póvoa P. Corticosteroids for severe influenza pneumonia: A critical appraisal. World J Crit Care Med 2016;5:89-95.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
de St. Maurice A, Halasa N. Immunization and treatment updates: 2016-2017 influenza season. Pediatr Transplant 2017;21:e12884.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Dioverti MV, Cawcutt KA, Schears GJ, Baddour LM. Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of influenza-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome in immunocompromised adults. Am J Med Sci 2016;352:81-5.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Gokturk B, Pekcan S, Guner SN, Artac H, Keles S, Kirac M, et al. Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in immunocompromised children with H1N1 influenza: A clinical observation. Clin Respir J 2016;10:223-30.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Lai KY, Ng WY, Osburga Chan PK, Wong KF, Cheng F. High-dose N-acetylcysteine therapy for novel H1N1 influenza pneumonia. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:687-8.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Samui K. Steroid therapy in swine flu: Beneficial or harmful. Apollo Med 2018;15:25.  Back to cited text no. 64
  [Full text]  
65.
Cornejo R, Llanos O, Fernández C, Carlos Díaz J, Cardemil G, Salguero J, et al. Organizing pneumonia in patients with severe respiratory failure due to novel A (H1N1) influenza. BMJ Case Rep 2010;2010. pii: bcr0220102708.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Roberts C, Nirmalan M, O'Shea S. Steroid-sensitive post-viral inflammatory pneumonitis (PVIP). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;182:1089-90.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Djibré M, Berkane N, Salengro A, Ferrand E, Denis M, Chalumeau-Lemoine L, et al. Non-invasive management of acute respiratory distress syndrome related to influenza A (H1N1) virus pneumonia in a pregnant woman. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:373-4.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:1351-63.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
ELSO Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Extracorporeal Life Support. Version 1.4. Ann Arbor, MI: USA; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Australia and New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) Influenza Investigators, Davies A, Jones D, Bailey M, Beca J, Bellomo R, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A (H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 2009;302:1888-95.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Pappalardo F, Pieri M, Greco T, Patroniti N, Pesenti A, Arcadipane A, et al. Predicting mortality risk in patients undergoing venovenous ECMO for ARDS due to influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia: The ECMOnet score. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:275-81.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Weber-Carstens S, Goldmann A, Quintel M, Kalenka A, Kluge S, Peters J, et al. Extracorporeal lung support in H1N1 provoked acute respiratory failure: The experience of the German ARDS network. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013;110:543-9.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Schmidt M, Zogheib E, Rozé H, Repesse X, Lebreton G, Luyt CE, et al. The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:1704-13.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.
Pham T, Combes A, Rozé H, Chevret S, Mercat A, Roch A, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pandemic influenza A (H1N1)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: A cohort study and propensity-matched analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:276-85.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Ison MG, Gubareva LV, Atmar RL, Treanor J, Hayden FG. Recovery of drug-resistant influenza virus from immunocompromised patients: A case series. J Infect Dis 2006;193:760-4.  Back to cited text no. 75
    
76.
Gubareva LV, Matrosovich MN, Brenner MK, Bethell RC, Webster RG. Evidence for zanamivir resistance in an immunocompromised child infected with influenza B virus. J Infect Dis 1998;178:1257-62.  Back to cited text no. 76
    
77.
Frenzel E, Chemaly RF, Ariza-Heredia E, Jiang Y, Shah DP, Thomas G, et al. Association of increased influenza vaccination in health care workers with a reduction in nosocomial influenza infections in cancer patients. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:1016-21.  Back to cited text no. 77
    
78.
Cowling BJ, Chan KH, Fang VJ, Cheng CK, Fung RO, Wai W, et al. Facemasks and hand hygiene to prevent influenza transmission in households: A cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:437-46.  Back to cited text no. 78
    
79.
Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Broder KR, Walter EB, Fry AM, Jernigan DB. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices-United States, 2018-19 influenza season. MMWR Recomm Rep 2018;67:1-20.  Back to cited text no. 79
    
80.
Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Ljungman P, Davies EG, Avery R, Tomblyn M, et al. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis 2013;58:e44-100.  Back to cited text no. 80
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Virology of Infl...
    Epidemiology of ...
    Clinical Feature...
    Peculiar Issues ...
    Diagnosis of Inf...
    Diagnostic Chall...
    Radiology in Imm...
    Diagnosis of Inv...
   Antiviral Agents
    Therapeutic Chal...
    Drug Resistance ...
    Prognostic Facto...
    Prevention Strat...
    Chemoprophylaxis...
    Vaccination in I...
   Future Directions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed396    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded126    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal