Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 1160   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
  Table of Contents    
COMMENTARY
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 353-355  

Sirolimus in lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A case in point for research in ‘orphan’ diseases


1 Department of Internal and Pulmonary Medicine, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Date of Web Publication28-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Parvaiz A Koul
Department of Internal and Pulmonary Medicine, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_280_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Koul PA, Mehfooz N. Sirolimus in lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A case in point for research in ‘orphan’ diseases. Lung India 2019;36:353-5

How to cite this URL:
Koul PA, Mehfooz N. Sirolimus in lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A case in point for research in ‘orphan’ diseases. Lung India [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 22];36:353-5. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2019/36/4/353/261702



Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare progressive lung disease that predominantly affects women of reproductive age.[1],[2] It is characterized by nonneoplastic, peribronchial, perivascular, and perilymphatic proliferation of atypical smooth muscle, resulting in vascular and airway obstruction, cyst formation, and progressive decline in lung function. Associated features include systemic angiomyolipomas (AMLs) and lymphangioleiomyomas. LAM occurs either sporadically or in combination with tuberous sclerosis.[2],[3] The invading cells arise from an unknown source and contain inactivating mutations in tuberous sclerosis proteins that result in mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway-driven cellular proliferation, migration, and survival,[1] eventually contributing to the uncontrolled proliferation of LAM cells.[4] Further, elaboration of lymphangiogenic growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor-D (VEGF-D) by the mutant cells promotes access to lymphatic channels and lymphangitic spread and likely contributes to cystic destruction of the lung and development of chylous effusions and abdominal lymphangiomyomas.[5]

Sirolimus, a macrolide produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus also known as rapamycin, binds to FK-binding protein-12 (FKBP-12) to form a complex (SRL/FKBP12) that binds to and inhibits the activation of mTORC1, leading to its antiproliferative action.[6] The drug has also been found to have immunosuppressive properties, but the mechanism of action of sirolimus in LAM is believed to be due to its antiproliferative effects.[7] Sirolimus has also been demonstrated to suppress the growth of spontaneously occurring renal tumors in various mice models such as Tsc1+/− and Tsc2+/− mice,[8] as well as in TSC2-deficient xenograft tumors in immune-deficient mice.[9]

Several clinical studies now support the efficacy of sirolimus in LAM. Bissler et al.[9] conducted the first trial, the Cincinnati Angiomyolipoma Sirolimus Trial, for the use of sirolimus in AML and demonstrated the significant effect of this drug in LAM, which was subsequently followed by many other studies supporting the effect of this drug in regression of this disease.

The landmark Multicenter International LAM Efficacy of Sirolimus (MILES) Trial demonstrated that the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus stabilized lung function, reduced serum VEGF-D, and improved functional performance and quality of life compared with placebo over 1 year, but the benefits waned when the drug was held in the 2nd year.[10] An observational study of 12 patients with lymphangioleiomyomas and chylous fluid collections demonstrated that sirolimus treatment resulted in complete resolution in most cases and provided evidence for durable efficacy and safety of sirolimus over an average of 2.6 years[11] Ando et al.,[12] in their observational study, further strengthened the observations of MILES Trial and in addition found that sirolimus was also effective in lower doses of 1 mg/day. Collectively, these and other data indicate that mTOR inhibition is an effective, exquisitely targeted suppressive therapy for LAM but that continuous and even lifelong therapy may be required for sustained benefit. In another phase 3 trial of patients with LAM, sirolimus improved lung function, quality of life, and functional performance.[13] Collectively, these studies led the US FDA to approve sirolimus for the drug treatment of LAM in 2015.

The current issue of Lung India carries a report by Ussavarungsi et al. of a patient with LAM having been treated with low-dose sirolimus[14] that resulted in the stabilization of the lung disease and effected a near-total regression of the abdominal lymphangioleiomyomas. The authors also present a comprehensive review of the use of sirolimus in abdominal lymphangioleiomyomas. In most of the studies, the blood trough level of sirolimus was maintained between 5 and 15 ng/mL, based on previous phase 1–2 trial. However, the optimal treatment dose was not given because a significant number of patients developed problematic side effects, such as stomatitis, and the potential risk of developing a malignant tumor increased with long-term use.[12]

Low-dose sirolimus treatment (trough level <5 ng/mL) has recently been shown by Ando et al. to improve lung function in 16 patients, nine without chylous effusion and seven with chylothorax with documented resolution of the effusion.[12] Several studies have demonstrated trends in improvement of FEV1 and disease progression after low-lose sirolimus treatment.[15],[16],[17] However, Bee et al. in a prospective LAM national cohort, demonstrated that lower serum sirolimus level was associated with fewer adverse effects (AEs) but not necessarily with lower efficacy in FEV1 decline.[15] Another mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, has recently been used for the treatment of LAM in open-label studies; this agent could also stabilize lung function and reduce angiomyolipomas and lymphangioleiomyomas with tolerable safety when administered in low doses.[16],[17] The most common side effects seen with sirolimus therapy include hypercholesterolemia, dyspepsia, stomatitis, lower extremity edema, acne, and diarrhea.[10]

However, it is important to note that while lower dose is indeed cost-effective and capable of reducing AEs, it may be inferior in efficacy to the conventional dose.[18] This is particularly of pneumonias requiring hospitalization. This might result in lesser number of patients requiring discontinuation of therapy as a result of AEs. Although sirolimus did not increase the risk of infection compared with the placebo in phase 3 clinical trial involving patients with LAM,[13] considering the increased risk of infection with sirolimus treatment in transplant patients, these results were probably due to the effect of low-dose sirolimus. An important point of consideration is the high rate of renal complications in the TSC-LAM group of patients. Since sirolimus has the potential to exacerbate pre-existing or newly occurring renal lesions by causing massive proteinuria, glomerulonephritis, or thrombotic microangiopathy,[19],[20] patients with TSC who already have impaired renal function might prefer low-dose sirolimus therapy.

Against this backdrop, low-dose sirolimus seems to be as efficacious as conventional dose sirolimus in patients with LAM, albeit at a risk of lower efficacy but with a lower frequency of AEs. Unfortunately, the design of adequately powered pivotal trials is challenging in rare diseases, for example, only few case reports exist in Indian literature regarding LAM,[21],[22],[23] and the largest Indian registry of interstitial lung disease, ILD India Registry, mentioned LAM in only 2 (0.2%) of 1047 cases.[24] Such data call for multicentric and multinational studies from densely populated countries such as India and China with a uniform protocol of diagnosis and treatment which might offer the opportunity to have adequate numbers for robust statistical conclusions on the management of such diseases. Professional international and international and national societies and non-governmental organizations need to chip in with support for such initiatives. This would ensure that the proper advancement of the science of such “orphan” diseases.



 
   References Top

1.
Henske EP, McCormack FX. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis – A wolf in sheep's clothing. J Clin Invest 2012;122:3807-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Harari S, Torre O, Cassandro R, Moss J. The changing face of a rare disease: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Eur Respir J 2015;46:1471-85.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Harari S, Torre O, Moss J. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: What do we know and what are we looking for? Eur Respir Rev 2011;20:34-44.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kenerson HL, Aicher LD, True LD, Yeung RS. Activated mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in the pathogenesis of tuberous sclerosis complex renal tumors. Cancer Res 2002;62:5645-50.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Seyama K, Kumasaka T, Kurihara M, Mitani K, Sato T. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A disease involving the lymphatic system. Lymphat Res Biol 2010;8:21-31.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sehgal SN. Sirolimus: Its discovery, biological properties, and mechanism of action. Transplant Proc 2003;35:7S-14S.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Krymskaya VP, McCormack FX. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A monogenic model of malignancy. Annu Rev Med 2017;68:69-83.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Goncharova EA, Goncharov DA, Li H, Pimtong W, Lu S, Khavin I,et al. MTORC2 is required for proliferation and survival of TSC2-null cells. Mol Cell Biol 2011;31:2484-98.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bissler JJ, McCormack FX, Young LR, Elwing JM, Chuck G, Leonard JM,et al. Sirolimus for angiomyolipoma in tuberous sclerosis complex or lymphangioleiomyomatosis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:140-51.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
McCormack FX, Inoue Y, Moss J, Singer LG, Strange C, Nakata K. Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. N Engl J Med 2008;364:1595-606.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Taveira-DaSilva AM, Hathaway O, Stylianou M, Moss J. Changes in lung function and chylous effusions in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis treated with sirolimus. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:797-805, W-292-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ando K, Kurihara M, Kataoka H, Ueyama M, Togo S, Sato T, et al. Efficacy and safety of low-dose sirolimus for treatment of lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Respir Investig 2013;51:175-83.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Davies DM, de Vries PJ, Johnson SR, McCartney DL, Cox JA, Serra AL,et al. Sirolimus therapy for angiomyolipoma in tuberous sclerosis and sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A phase 2 trial. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:4071-81.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ussavarungsi K, Laroia AT, Burger CD. Low-dose sirolimus in retroperitoneal lymphangioleiomyomas. Lung India 2019;36:349-52.  Back to cited text no. 14
  [Full text]  
15.
Bee J, Fuller S, Miller S, Johnson SR. Lung function response and side effects to rapamycin for lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A prospective national cohort study. Thorax 2018;73:369-375.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mohammadieh AM, Bowler SD, Silverstone EJ, Glanville AR, Yates DH. Everolimus treatment of abdominal lymphangioleiomyoma in five women with sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Med J Aust 2013;199:121-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
McCormack FX. Chronic sirolimus therapy for lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;190:1332-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
O'Callaghan FJ, Noakes MJ, Martyn CN, Osborne JP. An epidemiological study of renal pathology in tuberous sclerosis complex. BJU Int 2004;94:853-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Neurohr C, Hoffmann AL, Huppmann P, Herrera VA, Ihle F, Leuschner S,et al. Is sirolimus a therapeutic option for patients with progressive pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis? Respir Res 2011;12:66.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
McCormack FX, Inoue Y, Moss J, Singer LG, Strange C, Nakata K,et al. Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1595-606.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Verma AK, Joshi A, Mishra AR, Kant S, Singh A. Pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis presenting as spontaneous pneumothorax treated with sirolimus – A case report. Lung India 2018;35:154-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
22.
Verma SK, Verma SK. Pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis (PLAM). Lung India 2007;24:150-2.  Back to cited text no. 22
  [Full text]  
23.
Singh A, Singh J. Sudden onset of dyspnea in a woman with skin lesions and lung cysts. Lung India 2013;30:164-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
24.
Singh S, Collins BF, Sharma BB, Joshi JM, Talwar D, Katiyar S, et al. Interstitial lung disease in India. Results of a prospective registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:801-13.  Back to cited text no. 24
    




 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed68    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded16    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal