Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionContact Us   |  Subscribe   |  Advertise   |  Login  Page layout
Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
Lung India Official publication of Indian Chest Society  
  Users Online: 2305   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size

  Table of Contents   Next Article  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year :   |  Volume :   |  Issue :   |  Page :  

Coagulopathy in COVID-19


1 Medical student, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
2 Division of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Date of Submission10-Apr-2020
Date of Decision08-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance31-May-2020
Date of Web Publication16-Sep-2020

Correspondence Address:
Parth Rali,
Division of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_226_20

   Abstract 


Hemostatic derangement is a hallmark in severe COVID-19. Markedly elevation of D-dimer and fibrinogen degradation product levels were observed in patients with severe COVID-19 higher and 71.4% of nonsurvivors met the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Although the clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19 have been well-described, the underlying mechanism influencing disease severity remains to be elucidated. Herein, the aim of this review article is to evaluate hemostasis in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and its role in the management of this unprecedented pandemic.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome, anticoagulant, coagulopathy, COVID-19, D-dimer, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, heparin



How to cite this URL:
Lio KU, Rali P. Coagulopathy in COVID-19. Lung India [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2020 Sep 27]. Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=295233




   Introduction Top


Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), scientists and health-care workers around the globe are working incessantly to understand and combat the pandemic. Registered clinical trials are ongoing in hopes of finding timely and effective therapies. Up till now, no specific antiviral treatment exists, and management is mainly symptomatic treatment and organ support in the intensive care unit for severely ill patients. Although the clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19 have been well-described,[1],[2],[3],[4],[5] the underlying mechanism influencing disease severity remains to be elucidated. There has been growing concern about COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).[6],[7] An urgent need to identify the pathophysiologic factors is paramount, which can guide future treatment strategy in addressing the rising mortality. Herein, we aimed to evaluate hemostasis in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and its role in the management of this unprecedented pandemic.


   Pathophysiology of Coagulopathy in COVID-19 Top


Cytokine storm has been the most discussed theory explaining the varying disease severity in patients with COVID-19. Lung injury is thought as a result of the direct viral invasion and dysregulated, overactive host response driven by pro-inflammatory cytokines-the “cytokine storm.“[8] Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), “cytokine storm” is an acute systemic inflammatory response to a variety of insults (e.g., infection, drugs) characterized by increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1, IL-5, IL-8, IL-6, interferon γ), and activation of T lymphocytes, macrophages, and endothelial cells.[9] The theory is supported by the high serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, inflammatory markers, and lymphopenia observed in critically ill patients with COVID-19.[10],[11]

The cytokine storm has been the current focus of studies and clinical trials of immune-modulating therapies are emerging. A multicenter, randomized control trial of tocilizumab (IL-6 receptor antibody) has been approved in China for the treatment of COVID-19 patients with elevated IL-6 (ChiCTR2000029765). We observed markedly elevation of D-dimer in patients with COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab. Although thromboembolic events associated with tocilizumab use has not been reported, whether tocilizumab is prothrombotic remains to be elucidated. A study of tocilizumab use in rheumatoid arthritis and Castleman disease found that serum IL-6 and soluble IL-6R increases after its use.[12] Another study by Meley et al. found that tocilizumab use can contribute to the inflammatory status of mature dendritic cells through IL-6 receptor subunit modulation.[13] Regardless, significant abnormal coagulation function observed in COVID-19 implies the presence of other pathophysiologic factors contributing to disease progression, which could not be solely explained by CRS.

Inflammation and coagulation are the two important host defense mechanisms against injury and infection.[14] Sepsis is a dysregulated host response to infection leading to life-threatening organ dysfunction.[15] Although bacterial infection represents the majority of sepsis cases, viral infection (SAR-CoV-2) can cause sepsis. Coagulopathy commonly occurs in sepsis and arises as a result of an activated coagulation, which serves as an important host response to infection. Continued systemic inflammatory response and activated coagulation results in diffuse tissue hypoxia and organ failure.

The pathophysiology of pulmonary coagulation and fibrinolysis in acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) resembles that of sepsis.[16],[17] In ALI, normal hemostatic balance is disrupted and is characterized by activated coagulation and suppressed fibrinolysis. Procoagulable state is initiated by tissue factors (TF) from the enhanced expression on endothelial cells and monocytes mediated by different inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-1α, and nuclear factor kappa B). On the other hand, accelerated breakdown and/or decrease in the production of activated protein C (APC), antithrombin, and TF pathway inhibitor (TFPI) in the anti-coagulation pathway leads to shifted hemostasis. This results in abundant microthrombi formation within the pulmonary vasculature, and subsequently, impairs ventilation/perfusion and contributes to progressive respiratory failure. Pathologic findings observed in lung specimens of patients with COVID-19 are consistent with pulmonary coagulopathy, which revealed diffuse alveolar damage, proteinaceous exudates, fibrotic clots in small airways and disseminated intravascular thrombosis.[18],[19] Excess thrombin formation leads to consumptive thrombocytopenia, depletion of coagulation factor and secondary fibrinolysis (evidenced by elevated serum D-dimer, fibrinogen degradation product (FDP), and low fibrinogen levels), and eventually DIC.


   Deranged Hemostasis is Associated With Poor Prognosis in COVID-19 Top


Hemostatic derangement is a prominent feature observed in patients with COVID-19. Elevated D-dimer, prolonged prothrombin time (PT), and reduced platelets have been reported in severe cases in most cohorts.[2],[3],[4],[5],[6] A study by Han et al. evaluating coagulation function of 94 patients with COVID-19 found that the level of antithrombin (AT) was significantly lower, and levels of D-dimer, fibrin/FDP, and fibrinogen (FIB) were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls.[20] The presence of abnormal coagulation function in patients with COVID-19 indicates that homeostasis and fibrinolysis may play a pivotal role in the disease progression.[7] More importantly, patients with severe COVID-19 developed a greater extent of coagulation abnormalities (higher D-dimer and FDP) compared to patients with mild COVID-19, and progressive worsening of coagulation function was positively correlated with disease severity.[7],[20]

One cohort of 201 patients by Wu et al. concluded that organ and coagulation dysfunction (e.g., higher lactate dehydrogenase [hazard ratio (HR), 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44–1.79; and HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11–1.52, respectively] and D-dimer [HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04; and HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04, respectively]) are risk factors associated with the development of ARDS and progression to death.[21] For nonsurvivors with ARDS, D-dimer (difference, 2.10 μg/mL; 95% CI, 0.89-5.27 μg/mL; P = 0.001) was significantly elevated compared to patients with ARDS who survived. Importantly, Tang et al. studied coagulation parameters in 183 patients. Comparing survivors and nonsurvivors, D-dimer and FDP levels were significantly higher in non-survivors and 71.4% of nonsurvivors met the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria of DIC. The median time from admission to the development of DIC was 4 days.[1] Based on the currently available literature, coagulopathy is common in COVID-19 and could be the underlying pathogenesis leading to the progression of ARDS, Multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and DIC.


   Hemostasis and Its Role in Management of COVID-19 Top


Risk stratification and disease monitoring

D-dimer greater than 1ug/mL is a significant risk factor associated with poor prognosis in COVID-19.[4] Early and serial monitoring of hemostatic markers (PT, D-dimer, platelet, and fibrinogen) should be performed in all COVID-19 patients who required hospitalization. This can be helpful in risk stratification and identify patients at risk of worsening illness during hospitalization.

The concept of “sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC)” and SIC scoring has been advocated by the ISTH.[22] SIC scoring can be used to identify COVID-19 patients at risk of DIC. Parameters in SIC scoring include platelet count, PT ratio, fibrinogen, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score [Table 1].
Table 1: ISTH overt DIC and SIC scoring systems, adapted from J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Nov;17(11):1989-1994.

Click here to view


Thromboelastometry (TEG) could also be a useful tool in diagnosing alternations in coagulation and identifying COVID-19 patients at risk of DIC.[23] Studies have shown that the degree of hypocoagulability defined by TEG variables correlates with the severity of organ failure and is of prognostic value in critically ill patients.[24],[25]

Circulating microvesicles (MV) are small membrane fragments that can transfer mRNA and protein between cells.[26] During viral infection, MV-TF is released from endothelial cells and activates coagulation cascade. A study by Rondina et al. found that measuring serum IL-8 and MV-TF activity can allow early identification of patients with influenza A/H1N1 and are of prognostic values.[27] Measuring MV-TF activity and IL-8 levels might help identifying COVID-19 patients with coagulopathy.

Management of coagulopathy in COVID-19

Although coagulopathy is common in severe COVID-19 patients, recommendation on the management of coagulopathy in COVID-19 remains scarce. A guideline by the ISTH on management of coagulopathy in COVID-19 has been recently published.[28] A practical guidance for prevention of thrombosis and management of coagulopathy and DIC of patients infected with COVID-19 is also published on thrombosis UK (https://thrombosisuk. org/covid-19-thrombosis. php).

Thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 patients who required hospitalization

Anticoagulation therapy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has shown to be associated with better prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients with coagulopathy (defined by SIC score ≥4 or D-dimer >3.0 μg/mL).[1] The ISTH guidance recommends that prophylactic dose LMWH should be considered in all patients (including noncritically ill) who require hospitalization for COVID-19 infection, in the absence of any contraindications (active bleeding and platelet count <25 × 109/L; monitoring advised in severe renal impairment; abnormal PT or activated partial thromboplastin time is not a contraindication).[28]

Besides, LWMH prophylaxis is effective in preventing venous thromboembolic events in critically ill patients.[29] Pulmonary embolism (PE) should be suspected in patients who present with respiratory distress, sudden deterioration of oxygen saturation and hemodynamic instability. Case reports of acute PE in COVID-19 patients have been reported.[30],[31]

Disseminated intravascular coagulation in COVID-19 patients

General principles include both treatment of underlying infection and correcting coagulopathy. Blood product transfusions should be considered in patients with major bleeding, while patients with milder bleeding can be closely monitored and management expectantly. We acknowledge that there are considerable differences in the therapeutic approach to DIC across different countries and the availability and approval status of anticoagulant agents varies among countries. Evidence supporting the use of the most-studied anticoagulant agents is summarized in the following section (LMWH has been discussed as above).

Antithrombin

Global sepsis guidelines recommend against the use of AT because the results of a large-scale clinical trial (the KyberSept trial) reported an increased risk of bleeding.[32],[33] However, subsequently, results from multiple meta-analysis of AT replacement therapy in sepsis-associated DIC have shown beneficial effects in survival.[34],[35],[36],[37] Based on these results, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock recommend the AT replacement therapy in DIC patients with decreased AT activity.[38]

Recombinant thrombomodulin

Although currently, no guidelines recommend the use of recombinant thrombomodulin as first-line treatment in sepsis-induced DIC. In a meta-analysis of all recombinant thrombomodulin trials, Yamakawa et al. found a reduction of mortality rate by 13% (relative risk: 0.87, 95%, CI 0.74–1.03).[39]

Recombinant activated protein C

Recombinant APC (drotrecogin α), once approved as a novel therapy for sepsis, has been withdrawn from the market because subsequent clinical trials failed to demonstrate improvement in morality and raised concern about bleeding.[28],[40] A preclinical study of a recombinant APC variant (endotoxemia) reported reduced mortality in animal models of sepsis, but its efficacy has not been tested in clinical trials.[41]

Potential role of anticoagulant therapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Anticoagulant agents, such as LMWH, AT, recombinant APC, TFPI, and recombinant thrombomodulin, have been evaluated for the treatment of ALI/ARDS. In a meta-analysis of LMWH by Li et al., adjunctive treatment with LMWH appears is effective in reducing 7-day and 28-day mortality, improving the PaO2/FiO2 ratio among ALI/ARDS patients. Although previous clinical trials of other anticoagulant agents do not suggest beneficial effects in treating ARDS, given that patients with severe COVID-19 are coagulopathic and elevated D-dimer is associated with high mortality, evaluating its potential role in treating severe COVID-19 is warranted. Besides, as natural anticoagulant possesses anti-inflammatory properties (bidirectional communication between inflammation and thrombosis), it may potentially restore proper hemostasis and attenuate inflammation.

Potential role of fibrinolytic therapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Microvascular thrombi and fibrin deposits are the hallmarks of ARDS.[42] Suppressed fibrinolysis is evidenced by increased levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in bronchoalveolar lavage in ARDS patients.[43] Gralinski et al. suggest that dysregulation of the urokinase pathway and blockade of plasmin activity by a2-plasmin inhibitor is the mechanism of ARDS in animal models of SARS.[44] Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has been used for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, parapneumonic effusion, and empyema. Although current studies evaluating the therapeutic application of fibrinolytic agents in ARDS is still in the early preclinical stage, most of them have shown promising results.[45] Fibrinolytics can potentially be a therapeutic target in COVID-19 patients. Moore et al. recommends tPA as a novel treatment for refractory COVID-19 associated ARDS. They recommend a dose of 25 mg of tPA over 2 h followed by a 25 mg tPA infusion administered over the subsequent 22 h, with a dose not to exceed 0.9 mg/kg.[46]

Potential role of antiplatelet therapy

Antiplatelet therapy includes aspirin (cyclooxygenase inhibitor), clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor (P2Y12 inhibitors) and abciximab, eptifibatide and tirofiban (GPIIb/IIIa antagonist). Antiplatelet therapy has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with sepsis.[47] Some studies suggest that antiplatelet therapy is associated with reduced mortality and lower incidence of ARDS/ALI.[48],[49] Based on existing findings, antiplatelet agents may be effective in improving outcomes in patients with COVID-19.


   Conclusion Top


Coagulopathy is common in COVID-19 and coagulation markers (elevated D-dimer, prolonged PT, and thrombocytopenia) are indicators of poor outcomes. Early monitoring of coagulation markers in patients with COVID-19 can help stratify and identify patients at risk of worsening illness during hospitalization. This is of prime importance given the exponentially increasing number of cases and scarce healthcare resources. In COVID-19 patients with coagulopathy, prophylactic LMWH should be administered unless contraindicated. Therapeutic strategies targeting at restoring hemostasis might be useful in addressing this unprecedented, public health emergency.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020;395:507-13.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Liu K, Fang YY, Deng Y, Liu W, Wang MF, Ma JP, et al. Clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus cases in tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020;133:1025-31.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk dfactors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054-62.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1708-20.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Deng Y, Liu W, Liu K, Fang YY, Shang J, Zhou L, et al. Clinical characteristics of fatal and recovered cases of coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133:1261-7. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000824.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, Sun Z, et al. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:1094-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:844-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ, et al. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020;395:1033-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A, Gödel P, Subklewe M, Stemmler HJ, Schlößer HA, Schlaak M, et al. Cytokine release syndrome. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6:56.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Chen C, Zhang XR, Ju ZY, He WF. Advances in the research of cytokine storm mechanism induced by corona virus disease 2019 and the corresponding immunotherapies. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi 2020;36:E005.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Pedersen SF, Ho YC. SARS-CoV-2: A storm is raging. J Clin Invest 2020;130:2202-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Nishimoto N, Terao K, Mima T, Nakahara H, Takagi N, Kakehi T. Mechanisms and pathologic significances in increase in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble IL-6 receptor after administration of an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, tocilizumab, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Castleman disease. Blood 2008;112:3959-64.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Meley D, Héraud A, Gouilleux-Gruart V, Ivanes F, Velge-Roussel F. Tocilizumab contributes to the inflammatory status of mature dendritic cells through interleukin-6 receptor subunits modulation. Front Immunol 2017;8:926.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Levi M, van der Poll T. Inflammation and coagulation. Crit Care Med 2010;38 2 Suppl:S26-34.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bastarache JA, Ware LB, Bernard GR. The role of the coagulation cascade in the continuum of sepsis and acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2006;27:365-76.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Schultz MJ, Haitsma JJ, Zhang H, Slutsky AS. Pulmonary coagulopathy as a new target in therapeutic studies of acute lung injury or pneumonia – A review. Crit Care Med 2006;34:871-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:420-2.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Tian S, Hu W, Niu L, Liu H, Xu H, Xiao SY. Pulmonary pathology of early-phase 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia in two patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2020;15:700-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Han H, Yang L, Liu R, Liu F, Wu KL, Li J, et al. Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58:1116-20. doi:10.1515/cclm-2020-0188.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 13]. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;e200994. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Iba T, Levy JH, Warkentin TE, Thachil J, van der Poll T, Levi M, et al. Diagnosis and management of sepsis-induced coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Thromb Haemost 2019;17:1989-94.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Drumheller BC, Stein DM, Moore LJ, Rizoli SB, Cohen MJ. Thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry for the surgical intensivist: A narrative review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2019;86:710-21.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Müller MC, Meijers JC, Vroom MB, Juffermans NP. Utility of thromboelastography and/or thromboelastometry in adults with sepsis: A systematic review. Critical care 2014;18:R30.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Haase N, Ostrowski SR, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Møller MH, Tousi H, et al. Thromboelastography in patients with severe sepsis: A prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2015;41:77-85.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Owens AP 3rd, Mackman N. Microparticles in hemostasis and thrombosis. Circ Res 2011;108:1284-97.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Rondina MT, Tatsumi K, Bastarache JA, Mackman N. Microvesicle tissue factor activity and interleukin-8 levels are associated with mortality in patients with influenza A/H1N1 infection. Crit Care Med 2016;44:e574-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Thachil J, Tang N, Gando S, Falanga A, Cattaneo M, Levi M, et al. ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:1023-6.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Kanaan AO, Silva MA, Donovan JL, Roy T, Al-Homsi AS. Meta-analysis of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medically Ill patients. Clin Ther 2007;29:2395-405.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Xie Y, Wang X, Yang P, Zhang S. COVID-19 Complicated by Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2(2):e200067. Published 2020 Mar 16. doi:10.1148/ryct.2020200067.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Danzi GB, Loffi M, Galeazzi G, Gherbesi E. Acute pulmonary embolism and COVID-19 pneumonia: A random association? Eur Heart J 2020;1:1858.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:304-77.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Warren BL, Eid A, Singer P, Pillay SS, Carl P, Novak I, et al. Caring for the critically ill patient. High-dose antithrombin III in severe sepsis: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;286:1869-78.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Wiedermann CJ. Antithrombin concentrate use in disseminated intravascular coagulation of sepsis: Meta-analyses revisited. J Thromb Haemost 2018;16:455-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Kienast J, Juers M, Wiedermann CJ, Hoffmann JN, Ostermann H, Strauss R, et al. Treatment effects of high-dose antithrombin without concomitant heparin in patients with severe sepsis with or without disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:90-7.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Fourrier F, Chopin C, Huart JJ, Runge I, Caron C, Goudemand J. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antithrombin III concentrates in septic shock with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Chest 1993;104:882-8.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Nishiyama T, Kohno Y, Koishi K. Effects of antithrombin and gabexate mesilate on disseminated intravascular coagulation: A preliminary study. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1219-23.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Nishida O, Ogura H, Egi M, Fujishima S, Hayashi Y, Iba T, et al. The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J-SSCG 2016). Acute Med Surg 2018;5:3-89.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Yamakawa K, Murao S, Aihara M. Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in sepsis-induced coagulopathy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2019;119:56-65.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:699-709.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Kerschen EJ, Fernandez JA, Cooley BC, Yang XV, Sood R, Mosnier LO, et al. Endotoxemia and sepsis mortality reduction by non-anticoagulant activated protein C. J Exp Med 2007;204:2439-48.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Günther A, Mosavi P, Heinemann S, Ruppert C, Muth H, Markart P, et al. Alveolar fibrin formation caused by enhanced procoagulant and depressed fibrinolytic capacities in severe pneumonia. Comparison with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:454-62.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Ware LB, Matthay MA, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Januzzi JL, Eisner MD, et al. Pathogenetic and prognostic significance of altered coagulation and fibrinolysis in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1821-8.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Gralinski LE, Bankhead A 3rd, Jeng S, Menachery VD, Proll S, Belisle SE, et al. Mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury. mBio 2013;4:e00271-13.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Liu C, Ma Y, Su Z, Zhao R, Zhao X, Nie HG, et al. Meta-analysis of preclinical studies of fibrinolytic therapy for acute lung injury. Front Immunol 2018;9:1898.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Moore HB, Barrett CD, Moore EE, McIntyre RC, Moore PK, Talmor DS, et al. Is there a role for tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) as a Novel Treatment for Refractory COVID-19 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020;88:713-4.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Ouyang Y, Wang Y, Liu B, Ma X, Ding R. Effects of antiplatelet therapy on the mortality rate of patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis. J Crit Care 2019;50:162-8.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Mohananey D, Sethi J, Villablanca PA, Ali MS, Kumar R, Baruah A, et al. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on mortality and acute lung injury in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Card Anaesth 2016;19:626-37.  Back to cited text no. 48
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
49.
Erlich JM, Talmor DS, Cartin-Ceba R, Gajic O, Kor DJ. Prehospitalization antiplatelet therapy is associated with a reduced incidence of acute lung injury: A population-based cohort study. Chest 2011;139:289-95.  Back to cited text no. 49
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
   Next Article
 
  Search
 
  
     Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Lio KU
    -  Rali P
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Pathophysiology ...
    Deranged Hemosta...
    Hemostasis and I...
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed68    
    PDF Downloaded7    

Recommend this journal