Lung India

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 241--246

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing mediastinal lymphadenopathy


Tanushree Gahlot1, Ujjwal Parakh2, Kusum Verma3, Bobby Bhalotra2, Neeraj Jain2,  
1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt. SK Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Pathology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Tanushree Gahlot
CA/14C, DDA Flats, Munirka, New Delhi - 110 067
India

Abstract

Context: The diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy is always a challenge. There always a need of a technique that is highly accurate as well as safe for diagnosis the same. Aims: The aim of the study is to assess the clinical usefulness and safety profile of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in diagnosing the patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Settings and Design: This was an observational prospective study. Subjects and Methods: One hundred adult patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy who underwent EBUS-TBNA with aspirate obtained from the most hypoechoic lymph node (with a 22 gauge needle) and its cytopathological analysis were included in the study. Patients were observed for postprocedure complications. Results: Out of 100, 92 cases were reported as adequate (diagnostic yield = 92%). Among these 92, there were 71 granulomatous lymphadenitis (tuberculosis [TB] = 41 [44.5%], sarcoid-like granuloma = 30 [32.2%]). Malignancy was reported in 16 (17.3%) patients, and 5 (5.43%) were reported to have reactive lymphadenopathy. There was one case each of Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus. Out of 16 cases of malignancy, six cases were adenocarcinoma, four cases of squamous cell carcinoma, and two cases of small cell carcinoma. There were three cases of Hodgkin's lymphoma and one case of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. No major complications were noted, except fever (26), nausea (20), mild bleeding (4), bronchospasm (3), and transient intraprocedural hypoxia (2). Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA is highly accurate (diagnostic yield 92%) and safe procedure for diagnosing mediastinal lymphadenopathy. In our experience, granulomatous lymphadenitis was most common with TB as the main etiology.



How to cite this article:
Gahlot T, Parakh U, Verma K, Bhalotra B, Jain N. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing mediastinal lymphadenopathy.Lung India 2017;34:241-246


How to cite this URL:
Gahlot T, Parakh U, Verma K, Bhalotra B, Jain N. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Lung India [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Sep 16 ];34:241-246
Available from: http://www.lungindia.com/text.asp?2017/34/3/241/205339


Full Text

 Introduction



Enlargement of intrathoracic lymph nodes can be due to a variety of causes including infection, inflammation, neoplastic etiology, or just nonspecific reactive hyperplasia. Etiology of mediastinal lymphadenopathy differs in different regions of the world. While sarcoidosis, lymphoma, and metastatic cancer are the common causes in the developed countries, infections such as tuberculosis (TB) are more likely causes in the developing countries.

Until recently, tissue diagnosis of intrathoracic lymph nodes was being done by computed tomography (CT)-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy, mediastinoscopy, or thoracoscopy.[1] These investigations had limitations in terms of tissue yield, safety profile, and cost.[2],[3]

In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling either through the esophagus (EUS) or endobronchially (endobronchial ultrasound) has come up as safe and accurate method for achieving etiological diagnosis.[4],[5] Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is an excellent complementary test to CT and positron emission tomography (PET) scan in staging of solid tumors of the lungs, especially those which are small and do not show definitive evidence of malignancy on CT scan or even esophageal cancer (where assessing the mediastinal lymph node involvement is crucial).[6],[7]

Another important and clinically very useful indication of EBUS is in patient with mediastinal lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology.[8],[9] Apart from providing structural information about the airway wall and surrounding structures, central and peripheral lung histological specimens can be obtained under sonographic guidance improving diagnostic and patient management.[10],[11],[12] EBUS in a setup already using bronchoscopy and the training is a very cost-effective, feasible, and highly effective mode to evaluate mediastinal lymphadenopathy.[13],[14] In this study, we assessed the usefulness and safety profile of this technique in diagnosing mediastinal lymphadenopathy of unknown cause.

 Subjects and Methods



Study design

A prospective observational study was conducted on 100 consecutive patients in the department from November 2011 to January 2013. Adult inpatient and outpatient individuals with mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy of unknown cause as evident on chest radiograph/CT scan were included in the study whereas those with a history of coagulopathy and recent myocardial infarction were excluded from the study. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the institution. A written informed consent was taken from all the subjects. The study protocol included detailed history, examination findings, measurement of complete hemogram, bleeding parameters (activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time), tuberculin skin test (Mantoux) using 5 purified protein derivative units, and CT of the thorax.

Procedure

EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) was performed with a 22-gauge needle (NA-201 SX-4022) under ultrasound and color Doppler guidance with an EBUS bronchoscope (BF-UC 180F, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). EBUS-TBNA was performed on an outpatient/inpatient basis under conscious sedation using midazolam (2–5 mg intravenous [IV]) and pentazocine (10–30 mg IV). Lymph nodes stations and numbers were determined according to the 7th edition of the International Association of the Study of Lung Cancer Classification. EBUS-TBNA was performed through the bronchus with at least three passes of the needle per lesion. In each patient, the largest and/or most hypoechoic lymph node was targeted. Samples obtained by needle aspiration were analyzed by smear prepared as alcohol fixed in Papanicolaou stain and air-dried in May-Grunwald Giemsa stain.

All aspirates obtained were evaluated for:

Cytopathological examination (granulomas, necrosis, and tumor cells – further sent for typing of tumors)Mycobacterial smears and culture in normal saline.

Cell blocks were prepared in formalin and sent wherever malignancy was suspected on the basis of history, clinical, and laboratory evaluation. It underwent morphological evaluation and immunohistochemistry. Specimens were tested for thyroid transcription factor-1, p-63 and if required any specific stain or marker to track the primary site.

The usefulness was evaluated by EBUS-TBNA diagnosis based on cytopathologic and microbiological analysis. After the procedure, a patient was observed for 2 h and was instructed to contact the hospital in the case of chest pain, breathlessness, or any other complaint.

 Results



Baseline comparisons

The median age of study population was 47.1 years, with a range of 18–83 years. Forty of our patients belonged to age group of 40–60 years. This was followed by 31/100 patients in the age group of 20–40 years and 24/100 patients in 60–80 years. Only 4/100 and 1/100 patients were in 18–20 years and >80-year age group, respectively. Patients presented with fever (most common - 64), followed by cough (48). Shortness of breath was seen in 4 patients. Associated clinical features included weight loss (n = 42) and hemoptysis (n = 10) [Table 1].{Table 1}

On the basis of the CT scan findings, patients underwent EBUS-TBNA. In each patient, largest and most hypoechogenic node was targeted. Most commonly located and targeted lymph node in our study was subcarinal (Station No. 7), accounting for around 55.72% of the total targets followed by paratracheal (4R and 4L) (25.1%), hilar (Station No. 10) (13.7%), and pretracheal (3%) lymph nodes (Station No. 2) [Figure 1].{Figure 1}

Cytopathological analyses of air-dried and alcohol-fixed smear showed adequate samples in 92/100 patients, i.e., with cytological findings suggestive of granuloma or atypical cells or reactive lymphoid tissue (rapid on-site evaluation [ROSE] was not performed due to nonavailability of on-site pathologist). Inadequate sample was 8/100 in which no definite pathology was obtained, and only scant material was aspirated. On further analysis of adequate samples, 71/92 (77.1%) were granulomas, followed by malignancy in 16/92 (17.3%). Reactive lymph nodes were 5/92 (5.4%) [Figure 2].{Figure 2}

Out of the 71 patients with granuloma on cytology, 38 patients had necrosis, i.e., necrotizing granulomatous lymphadenitis and 33 had nonnecrotizing granulomas. Definitive diagnosis of mycobacterial disease was made when acid-fast bacilli (AFB) seen on Zeihl–Neelsen (ZN) staining and/or culture for mycobacteria was positive. The cases with necrotizing granuloma (AFB smear and culture negative) and a suggestive clinical profile were diagnosed as probable cases of TB (11/71 patients). Presumptive diagnosis of sarcoidosis and sarcoid-like granuloma was made on the basis of nonnecrotizing granuloma and AFB negative on ZN stain, with supportive clinical settings, namely, angiotensin-converting enzyme positive, tuberculin negative, and radiological evidence in 30/71 patients. One case each of Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium intercellulare was observed [Table 2] and [Figure 3].{Table 2}{Figure 3}

Malignancy was found in 16 (17.3%) patients. The most common malignancy was adenocarcinoma (6/16), followed by squamous cell (4/16) and small cell carcinoma (2/16). There were 3 patients of Hodgkin's lymphoma and one had non-Hodgkin' lymphoma, differentiated on the basis of immunohistochemistry.

Thus final diagnosis (out of 100 samples) was classified as follows:

Confirmed TB (30%)Probable TB (11%) (necrotizing granuloma; AFB negative)Atypical mycobacteria disease (2%)Rest of nonnecrotizing granulomatous lymphadenitis (including cases of sarcoidosis and sarcoid-like reaction) (33%)Malignant (16%)Reactive lymphadenitis (5%)Nondiagnostic sample (8%) [Table 3] and [Figure 4].{Table 3}{Figure 4}

On analyzing the safety profile, fever of mild to moderate in nature was seen in 26/100 patients who were relieved by taking a single dose of antipyretics. Nausea was seen in 40/100 patients. Mild bleeding and oxygen desaturation were observed in 4/100 and 2/100 patients, respectively, which were controlled by conservative measures during the procedure. Occasional complaints of bronchospasm were observed in 3/100 patients during observation period. All the patients were discharged from the hospital 3 h postprocedure, and none required any prolonged hospital stay or treatment from procedural complications.

 Discussion



In our prospective observational study, we analyzed the data of 100 consecutive adult patients presenting to the department. Previous studies on diagnosis of mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy by EBUS-TBNA have had a wide variation in total number of subjects and mean age. The range varied from as low as 18 in a study by Rintoul et al. to 502 in a study by Herth et al.[14],[15] In our study, the age group ranged between 18 and 83 years with mean age group of 47.1 years, implying a relatively younger age group involvement.[16],[17] On the basis of CT findings, lymph nodes were targeted at least thrice which is recommended as per the current guidelines and other studies.[18],[19] Most common lymph nodes targeted were the mediastinal (subcarinal station 7 [55%] and paratracheal [25%]) lymph nodes followed by hilar (18%), which comprise maximum targeted in other studies as well.[20]

In our study, there were 92 adequate samples, i.e., a high diagnostic yield of 92% with adequacy being defined as cytological findings suggestive of granuloma or atypical cells or reactive lymphoid tissue. Other international studies have reported higher diagnostic yield, ranging from 93.5% to 100%.[16],[21],[22] These studies have evaluated suspected mediastinal metastasis of bronchogenic carcinoma or diagnosis of suspected malignancy. There is, however, a wide variation in recent Indian literature reports yield around 88% by Dhamija et al. and 78% by Gupta et al.[23],[24] The adequacy varied over such a vast range due to variation in sample size, lymph node size (subcentimeter), calcified nodes, and learning curve of the procedure [Table 4].{Table 4}

Currently, thoracic CT and PET are used in the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Thoracic CT has a sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 81% in identifying malignant disease. PET-CT has a higher sensitivity and specificity than CT, but false positives may still occur, particularly in patients with granulomatous diseases such as TB and sarcoidosis.[6],[7] False negatives may also occur and are more common in lung adenocarcinoma and metastatic disease. The accuracy can be enhanced, and the false results can be reduced by combing imaging tools with EBUS.[25]

The sensitivity and specificity of real-time EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy seem to be equivalent or even superior to that of mediastinoscopy, the "standard technique" with a diagnostic yield reported to be very high.[26],[27] However, mediastinoscopy can only sample nodal stations 1-4 and 7 but access to hilar nodal locations could be difficult and may require thoracoscopy and on some occasion a thoracotomy. Moreover, it cannot be repeatedly operated on the same patient.

Prior to the availability of EBUS, conventional TBNA and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) have been the procedures of choice for diagnosis of intrathoracic pathology such as sarcoidosis.[28] However, they have been mired with fears of poor yield and complications such as pneumothorax and lack of real-time guidance. EBUS came out to be as a single best procedure to obtain histological proof, especially sarcoidosis; however, according to the study by Gupta et al., it needs to be combined with TBLB for the best diagnostic yield. Further, if EBUS-TBNA is not available, conventional TBNA (with endobronchial biopsy and TBLB) may be used with equal efficacy.[24]

A recent study from India described the transesophageal use of the EBUS scope for diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in adults. It found the technique to be simple and feasible and when combined with EBUS-TBNA. This approach covers the main limitation of EBUS-TBNA to visualize posterior nodes. Hence, EBUS-TBNA, when combined with EUS, can sample all the key nodal stations and also can be performed repeatedly.[29],[30]

Out of these 92 cases, majority was constituted by granulomatous pathology (77%). The next common pathology was malignancy (17%) followed by reactive pathology seen in 5.4 cases. In India, studies so far show a similar trend. An Indian study by Srinivasan et al. reported 37 cases, in which sarcoidosis was 53.8%, TB was 23.3%, and malignancy was 17.9%.[31] However, western literature reported malignancy as the main etiology. Herth et al. reported malignancy in 82% and granulomatous in 12% (sarcoidosis 9% and TB 3%).[16] Navani et al also evaluated role of EBUS TBNA in diagnosing tuberculosis.[32]

Various studies have classified granulomatous etiology into mycobacterial and sarcoid. Studies by Lee et al. and Tremblay et al. also used cytological criteria, wherein they included only cases of sarcoid hence were biased. In our study,[33] we divided granulomatous etiology on the basis of cytopathology in addition to the clinical and laboratory data on the lines of the studies by Asano and Costabel and Hunninghake.[34],[35] On the basis of these criteria, TB was observed in 41 cases (57.7% of granulomatous) and sarcoidosis in thirty cases (42.4% of granulomatous).

Recent studies have also been conducted on using EBUS-guided morphological characteristics of lymph nodes in diagnosis of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy such as size, shape, margins, echogenic appearance, and the presence of a central blood vessel.[36]

Malignancy was seen in 17.3% cases. When we compare our data with studies in western countries, we found that malignancy constitutes a lesser proportion of cases. Another important observation was sending cell blocks prepared in formalin increased the yield. It allows pathologist to carry out immunohistochemistry and cell markers to evaluate atypical cells in specimens.

There were 5.43% (n=5) patients with cytological diagnosis of reactive lymphoid tissue requiring confirmation of diagnosis via more invasive procedures such as thoracoscopy and mediastinoscopy. These patients, however, refused further investigation and workup.

All the patients were observed for any intraprocedural and postprocedural complications. Fever was seen in 26 patients which was a higher number as compared to previous studies. Mild self-limiting bleeding and nausea were observed in ten and twenty patients, respectively. None of the studies reported serious complications. Only three studies reported having observed agitation, cough, and presence of blood at the puncture site. Some studies have reported mediastinal abscess and inflammatory polyp as a sequel to EBUS.[37],[38],[39] However, in our study, no major complication was observed. EBUS-guided fine needle aspiration is not only a safe procedure but also helps us getting tissue diagnosis with minimal invasion.

Limitations of the study include (1) lack of follow-up of all cases with not confirmed diagnosis and (2) comparison of the tool with the gold standard, i.e., the mediastinoscopy. ROSE was also not performed as per the institutional nonavailability of an on-site cytopathologist.[19]

 Conclusions



Our data show that EBUS TBNA is a safe procedure with high diagnostic yield.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1McManus TE, Haydock DA, Alison PM, Kolbe J. Isolated mediastinal adenopathy: The case for mediastinoscopy. Ulster Med J 2008;77:97-101.
2Kitami A, Suzuki T, Usuda R, Masuda M, Suzuki S. Diagnostic and therapeutic thoracoscopy for mediastinal disease. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;10:14-8.
3Gossot D, Toledo L, Fritsch S, Celerier M. Mediastinoscopy vs thoracoscopy for mediastinal biopsy. Results of a prospective nonrandomized study. Chest 1996;110:1328-31.
4Herth FJ, Lunn W, Eberhardt R, Becker HD, Ernst A. Transbronchial versus transesophageal ultrasound-guided aspiration of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:1164-7.
5Vilmann P, Krasnik M, Larsen SS, Jacobsen GK, Clementsen P. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) biopsy: A combined approach in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. Endoscopy 2005;37:833-9.
6Plat G, Pierard P, Haller A, Hutsebaut J, Faber J, Dusart M, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound and positron emission tomography positive mediastinal lymph nodes. Eur Respir J 2006;27:276-81.
7Hwangbo B, Kim SK, Lee HS, Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, et al. Application of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration following integrated PET/CT in mediastinal staging of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 2009;135:1280-7.
8Herth F, Becker HD, LoCicero J 3rd, Ernst A. Endobronchial ultrasound in therapeutic bronchoscopy. Eur Respir J 2002;20:118-21.
9Bugalho A, Doris MK, Hamacher J, Eberhardt R, Herth FJ. Endobronchial ultrasound: Practical aspects and clinical applications. Rev Port Pneumol 2008;14:55-88.
10Kurimoto N, Murayama M, Yoshioka S, Nishisaka T. Analysis of the internal structure of peripheral pulmonary lesions using endobronchial ultrasonography. Chest 2002;122:1887-94.
11Chao TY, Lie CH, Chung YH, Wang JL, Wang YH, Lin MC. Differentiating peripheral pulmonary lesions based on images of endobronchial ultrasonography. Chest 2006;130:1191-7.
12Omori S, Takiguchi Y, Hiroshima K, Tanabe N, Tatsumi K, Kimura H, et al. Peripheral pulmonary diseases: Evaluation with endobronchial US initial experience. Radiology 2002;224:603-8.
13Hürter T, Hanrath P. Endobronchial sonography in the diagnosis of pulmonary and mediastinal tumors. Dstsch Med Wochenschr 1990;115:1899-905.
14Rintoul RC, Skwarski KM, Murchison JT, Wallace WA, Walker WS, Penman ID. Endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging. Eur Respir J 2005;25:416-21.
15Herth FJ, Eberhardt R, Vilmann P, Krasnik M, Ernst A. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes. Thorax 2006;61:795-8.
16Herth FJ, Ernst A, Eberhardt R, Vilmann P, Dienemann H, Krasnik M. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of lymph nodes in the radiologically normal mediastinum. Eur Respir J 2006;28:910-4.
17Yasufuku K, Nakajima T, Motoori K, Sekine Y, Shibuya K, Hiroshima K, et al. Comparison of endobronchial ultrasound, positron emission tomography, and CT for lymph node staging of lung cancer. Chest 2006;130:710-8.
18Lee HS, Lee GK, Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, Kim HY, et al. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: How many aspirations per target lymph node station? Chest 2008;134:368-74.
19Wahidi MM, Herth F, Yasufuku K, Shepherd RW, Yarmus L, Chawla M, et al. Technical aspects of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2016;149:816-35.
20Yasufuku K, Chiyo M, Sekine Y, Chhajed PN, Shibuya K, Iizasa T, et al. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Chest 2004;126:122-8.
21Nakajima T, Yasufuku K, Iyoda A, Yoshida S, Suzuki M, Sekine Y, et al. The evaluation of lymph node metastasis by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Crucial for selection of surgical candidates with metastatic lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1485-90.
22Medford AR. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2010;120:459-66.
23Dhamija A, Basu A, Sharma V. Mediastinal adenopathy in India: Through the eyes of endobranchial ultrasound. J Assoc Physicians India 2015;63:15-8.
24Gupta D, Dadhwal DS, Agarwal R, Gupta N, Bal A, Aggarwal AN. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration vs conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Chest 2014;146:547-56.
25Gogia P, Insaf TZ, McNulty W, Boutou A, Nicholson AG, Zoumot Z, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound: Morphological predictors of benign disease. ERJ Open Res 2016;2:53-60.
26Pearson FG. Mediastinoscopy: A method of biopsy in the superior mediastinum. Can J Surg 1963;6:423-9.
27Carlens E. Mediastinoscopy: A method for inspection and tissue biopsy in the superior mediastinum. Dis Chest 1959;36:343-52.
28Goyal A, Gupta D, Agarwal R, Bal A, Nijhawan R, Aggarwal AN. Value of different bronchoscopic sampling techniques in diagnosis of sarcoidosis: A prospective study of 151 patients. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2014;21:220-6.
29Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Singh N, Gupta D, Behera D, Gupta N, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with an echobronchoscope in undiagnosed mediastinal lymphadenopathy:First experience from India. Lung India 2014;32:6-10.
30Sharma M. Combined imaging for benign mediastinal lymphadenopathy: Endoscopic ultrasonography first or endobronchial ultrasonography first? Chest 2011;140:558-9.
31Srinivasan A, Agarwal R, Gupta N, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D. Initial experience with real time endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration from a tertiary care hospital in north India. Indian J Med Res 2013;137:803-7.
32Navani N, Molyneaux PL, Breen RA, Connell DW, Jepson A, Nankivell M, et al. Utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with tuberculous intrathoracic lymphadenopathy: A multicentre study. Thorax 2011;66:889-93.
33Tremblay A, Stather DR, MacEachern P, Khalil M, Field SK. A randomized controlled trial of standard vs endobronchial ultra sonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with suspected sarcoidosis. Chest 2009;136:340-6.
34Asano S. Granulomatous lymphadenitis. J Clin Exp Hematop 2012;52:1-16.
35American thoracic society. Statement on sarcoidosis. Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders (WASOG) adopted by the ATS Board of Directors and by the ERS Executive Committee, February 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:736-55.
36Varela-Lema L, Fernández-Villar A, Ruano-Ravina A. Effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration: A systematic review. Eur Respir J 2009;33:1156-64.
37Huang CT, Chen CY, Ho CC, Yu CJ. A rare constellation of empyema, lung abscess, and mediastinal abscess as a complication of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:264-5.
38Moffatt-Bruce SD, RossPJr. Mediastinal abscess after endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration: A case report. J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;5:33.
39Gupta R, Park HY, Kim H, Um SW. Endobronchial inflammatory polyp as a rare complication of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;11:340-1.